Further, the concept of equal treatment under the law doesn't allow for qualifiers; it either exists, or you are violating individual liberties of a disfavored majority.
Not exact matches
if there is a
law passed that helps the many but upsets the few, then so be it... as long as it falls in line with
equal treatment under the
law and doesn't cause harm to anyone physically.
due to some crazy religious beliefs out there in the world i.e. marrying off young children and marrying genetic kin, the government can't ever allow religion to dictate marriage policy, so have your ceremonies and deny same - gender couples to marry in your church but bluntly stated your crying and foot - stomping will accomplish nothing, marriage isn't a religious thing it is a civil rights and equality thing, thus if the religious win by denying same gender cuples their civil rights to
equal treatment under the
law, then don't be surprised when others use those same grounds to deny you your rights
under the
law.
Psychiatric service dog teams, unfortunately, don't receive
equal treatment with other SD's
under this
law.
Not enough money to provide
equal treatment under the
law to all emitters and not much chance of winning the inevitable 14th amendment lawsuits if they don't.
78 However, the absence of such an autonomous and uniform definition
under European Union
law of the concepts of social security, social assistance and social protection and the reference to national
law in Article 11 (1)(d) of Directive 2003/109 concerning those concepts
do not mean that the Member States may undermine the effectiveness of Directive 2003/109 when applying the principle of
equal treatment provided for in that provision.
On other issues: Both Democrats support the federal Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA), hate crimes legislation, coverage for domestic partners
under the Family and Medical Leave Act,
equal treatment of gay couples
under tax
laws, and repeal of the military's «Don't Ask, Don't Tell» policy.