Sentences with phrase «equal treatment whether»

Collaborative Divorce is about fairness, cooperation, and equal treatment whether for men or women, whether in traditional or same - sex marriages.

Not exact matches

Through a series of brief questions at the end of his book, Sigmund invites liberation theologians to seek ways of fusing capitalist market «efficiency» with the «preferential love for the poor,» to consider how private property is not always oppression but may in fact free people from it, to develop liberalism's ideal of «equal treatment under the law,» to nurture the «fragile new democracies» in Latin America, and, finally, to develop «a spirituality of socially concerned democracy, whether capitalist or socialist in its economic form,» rather than «denouncing dependency, imperialism, and capitalist exploitation.»

At their best, feminism advocates would like more attention put on workplace discrimination, whether for pay discrepencies or sexual misconduct, and the general equal treatment of women (among other things).

The legal priorities would be being considered truly equal, the freedom from torture or cruel treatment, whether at the hands of the state or not, and the ability to live both freely and safely.

In the 2013 - 2014 school year, with 200 teachers (in 50 schools) in the treatment group and an equal number in a control group participating, we examine whether digital video technology can improve teaching practice and student outcomes in treatment classrooms; whether it is preferred by both teachers and principals to in - person observations; and whether it presents a cost - effective, scalable alternative to in - person observations.

When funding any school, whether public or private, the government should not surrender the longstanding principle of equal treatment for all regardless of religion.

In the narrower legal context, this Hayekian - Rawlsian debate usually manifests itself in arguments about whether the law should protect «negative rights,» that is, protect persons from government encroachment on their inalienable rights — like private property and free exercise of religion, or whether the law should foster «positive rights,» that is, promote the rights of people to receive tangible things like free health care or housing under the auspices of equal treatment under the law.

The question was whether EU law (Directives 2000/43 on equal treatment on the basis of ethnicity, 2000/78 on equal treatment in employment and 2006/54 on equal treatment on grounds of sex in matters of employment) required the employer to disclose information on the grounds of refusal if a candidate demonstrates she meets the requirements listed in the job ad.

The question the Court needed to answer here was, firstly, whether housing benefits fall under the concept of social security and social protection, and secondly, whether the Italian authorities could limit the principle of equal treatment to «core benefits» of the social security system in such a way that it would exclude housing benefits.

Factor 4.1, «Equal treatment and absence of discrimination,» measures whether individuals are free from discrimination - based on socio - economic status, gender, ethnicity, religion, national origin, or sexual orientation, or gender identity - including with respect to public services, employment, court proceedings, and the justice system.

Even after the recent election, public officials can continue to oppose the death penalty by questioning whether its day - to - day practices are compatible with central American values, like due process and equal treatment...

Importance: The primary issue before the Court of Appeal was whether the Divisional Court properly applied the reasonableness standard to the Tribunal's decision — the blog posts did not infringe Ms. Taylor - Baptiste's right to equal treatment «with respect to employment without discrimination» under section 5 (1) of the Code.

There is also ambiguity in the draft Withdrawal Agreement about whether or not such individuals will even then have the right to work in the host state and whether they will in any event have the right to equal treatment.

The Court considered the following issues: (1) Whether the Framework Directive (Directive 2000 / 78 / EC Establishing a Framework for Equal Treatment in Employment and Occupation) applies to volunteers?

O'Brien v Ministry of Justice [2013] UKSC 6 and (C - 393 / 10)[2012] 2 C.M.L.R. 25: a landmark case on whether part - time judges in the UK are workers, and so entitled to equal treatment in respect of pension benefits.

Whether one refers to natural justice, procedural fairness, due process, the right or opportunity to be heard, the principle of contradiction (le principe de la contradiction) or the right to equal treatment, the underlying conception of fairness is the same.

[2] The question on this appeal is whether the criminal prohibition that puts a person to this choice violates her Charter rights to life, liberty and security of the person (s. 7) and to equal treatment by and under the law (s. 15).

The landmark 1954 case considered whether or not public education systems of racial segregation, premised on «separate but equal» treatment of white and black students, actually served to perpetuate inferior accommodations, services and opportunities for black students.

That defence has hitherto failed when based on trade union action to protect wages but one interesting question in an «equal ops» case (shorn of the complicated arguments on the Posted Workers Directive) would be whether such a justification defence would be more likely to succeed if itself based on another area of EC law, ie the Equal Treatment Direcequal ops» case (shorn of the complicated arguments on the Posted Workers Directive) would be whether such a justification defence would be more likely to succeed if itself based on another area of EC law, ie the Equal Treatment DirecEqual Treatment Directive.

This appeal considered whether the principle of fair and equal treatment can require a decision - maker to replicate the effect of assurances given to one party that were made based on a mistake of legal principle in favour of other parties in a comparable position.

Use these scenarios as a jumping - off point at one of your sales meeting to discuss whether all your clients and customers are getting equal treatment.