Not exact matches
This approach
forms part of our commitment to meet the Public Sector
Equality Duty requirement to have due regard to the need to eliminate discrimination, advance
equality of opportunity and to foster good relations.
First, if one accepts that the obligation to acknowledge one's
duty to «promote
equality, diversity and inclusion generally» is a
form of compelled speech, then it's hard to see how such an obligation can be justified under section 1, given that no such obligation actually exists — hard to see how an obligation to acknowledge a non-existent obligation is a reasonable limitation that can be justified in a free and democratic society.
I mean, if one accepts that you have a general
duty to promote
equality, can you ethically vote for tax cuts for the rich or a reduction in minimum wage rates (which might predictably increase one
form of inequality)?