Sentences with phrase «equality rights argument»

Not exact matches

Locke does not reiterate but perhaps implies Hobbes's argument for equality because each of us is capable, as a biological entity, of killing any other under the right circumstances.

As I conclude, it has become clear that the arguments invoked in the name of equality, love, protection, and of the right to a child do not stand up and can not, by themselves, justify a law.

It was always more likely that this measure could face more difficulty in the Lords (given the opposition of some Bishops in the earlier debates, which has been challenged by their colleagues more recently; and the traditionalist right arguments of Tebbit / Waddington on equality issues generally usually have somewhat more support in the Lords than the Commons)

Values of Western culture have, throughout history, been derived from political thought, widespread employment of rational argument favouring freethought, assimilation of human rights, the need for equality, and democracy.

For the I Still Love You video, Jennifer Hudson teamed up with Human Rights Campaign to create a piece that is both a song about love and an argument in favor of marriage equality.6 The romantic (yet totally danceable) result is definitely one for the wedding playlist!

Now, I think your argument is the more definitive argument — the LSUC folks have a suspect interpretation of the Charter, which they seem to think allows them to violate charter rights willy nilly, whereas the absence of an obligation to «promote equality, diversity and inclusion» is incontestable.

Arguments focus for example on the s. 28 equality rights.

Section 15 equality rights would also anchor arguments pertaining to the infringement on women's rights.

The duty to make legal services adequately available should be given constitutional status based upon a Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms s. 15 «equality rights» argument that recognizes, «legal services at reasonable cost» as a constitutional right, based upon the principle that being middle class, or of «middle income,» and unable to obtain legal services at reasonable cost, is a state of one's condition that is «immutable, or changeable only at unacceptable cost to personal identity,» and to one's ability to invoke constitutional rights and freedoms, and the rule oRights and Freedoms s. 15 «equality rights» argument that recognizes, «legal services at reasonable cost» as a constitutional right, based upon the principle that being middle class, or of «middle income,» and unable to obtain legal services at reasonable cost, is a state of one's condition that is «immutable, or changeable only at unacceptable cost to personal identity,» and to one's ability to invoke constitutional rights and freedoms, and the rule orights» argument that recognizes, «legal services at reasonable cost» as a constitutional right, based upon the principle that being middle class, or of «middle income,» and unable to obtain legal services at reasonable cost, is a state of one's condition that is «immutable, or changeable only at unacceptable cost to personal identity,» and to one's ability to invoke constitutional rights and freedoms, and the rule orights and freedoms, and the rule of law.

We are extremely proud this year to be presenting our Great Friend of Justice award to Mary L. Bonauto, the civil rights lawyer whose powerful arguments and long - term legal strategies have led to historic strides in achieving marriage equality for same - sex couples across the United States.

When you're challenging the denial of workers compensation or income assistance benefits, the last thing you need is a complex set of restrictions about how and when you are allowed to bring forward arguments about your Charter - protected equality rights.

Even though the High Court had rejected, in the Native Title Act Case, the argument that because native title has different characteristics from other forms of title and derives from a different source, native title holders can be deprived of their property rights, this argument was recouched as part of an international law notion of substantive equality.

Once again couched in the rhetoric of equality, father's rights groups used some of the very same arguments to achieve a surge of support for father's rights, including the revolutionary UNWED father's rights, all under the same guise of «parental responsibility.»