You are buying into the BS that everyone has
an equally valid opinion and that EVERYONE has to agree before something can be done.
48 Completely Fed Up: «You are buying into the BS that everyone has
an equally valid opinion» Total nonsense.
I think
an equally valid opinion would be that «no, if there was actual evidence, it wouldn't be dismissed as typical collaboration».
Not exact matches
That is exactly my point... your «understanding» of Jesus, and Fred Phelps «understanding» of Jesus are
equally valid because it is nothing more than an
opinion... except it is framed as objective.
At the real heart of the issue there is no way to assertain which theology is correct because it is all a matter of
opinion and they are all
equally valid with no empirical basis for any of them.
Not all
opinions are
equally valid.
The PC view, for example, is that
opinions are
equally valid, except for non-PC
opinions held by people lacking PRC.
Of course everyone has his or her own
opinion, and being a reflection of personal preferences and points of view, those
opinions are
equally valid.
Americans tend to feel any
opinion on any subject is
equally valid, no matter what your qualifications, or lack thereof, in the field in question.
If what I've found is typical (and I have no reason to think it is not), then basically they have the attitude that, «Everyone has an
opinion and all
opinions are
equally valid.»
Some might misinterpret this sentence to imply that everyone's
opinion is
equally valid on climate solutions, but expertise matters in that realm also.
The poling process would be
equally valid for the proposition «multiple supreme beings exist» (to enlist the monotheist reader in the argument), and the supporting statistics of
opinion.