Sentences with phrase «equate risk»

«You can't equate the risk of a new retail development with a building that will be leased to doctors to operate their practice,» he says.

Your Anaheim insurance quotes will vary form company to company, but the above factors are generally used to equate your risk of death.

Your Anaheim insurance quotes will vary form company to company, but the above factors are generally used to equate your risk of death.

They equate risk with volatility.

However, most of us equate RISK with «losses» directly.

I do not equate risk with the inevitable short - term movements of the market.

Stocks, bonds, mutual funds, real - estate properties, gold, precious metals etc., can lose value, sometimes even all their value.However, most of us equate RISK with «losses» directly.

A few of the cases of toxicity were unusual and would not equate risk to typical users.

Through some simplifying assumptions, modern portfolio theory equates risk with volatility.

These managers also love equating risk with volatility since it gives investors the impression that risk can be precisely quantified which justifies their fees.

Equating risk and volatility may be too simplistic to deal with the world we face today.

Traditionally, investors have equated risk with the extent to which an investment's price or returns bounce up and down.

Then there's his use of a false analogy that equates risk management for passenger air travel to that for natural gas drilling and groundwater contamination.

Not exact matches

Subscriptions equate to less than $ 2 per day (with annual discount) and you can test - drive our ETF and stock picking service risk - free for the first 30 days.

Therefore, a lower credit score can equate to being a higher risk, and vice versa.

A debt / GDP ratio margin of 2.38 % equate to a 90 percentile — A debt / GDP ratio of 2.38 % is considered by NIA to be «really dangerous», which implies that the stock market is risking a dramatic fall in the short - term.

Uncertainty equates to risk under only two circumstances: first, if your investment time horizon is not long enough to wait out an asset's reversion to its fair value.

We don't, however, equate uncertainty with risk.

Meanwhile, if we lose the ability to respect that people can only go as far as their consciences will allow, we risk becoming mired in a muck of illusion, imagining hate where none exists, equating compelled behavior with authentic love, and losing sight of the fact that traveling together sometimes means that we walk the extra mile on one challenging road, and they walk it on the next.

The paper they reference is on - line at http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736%2802%2909454-0/fulltext, and, as you can see, the reduction the study found in risk actually equated to 4.3 % of initial risk for every twelve months of breastfeeding.

They try to equate hazard with risk, when the two are not the same thing AT ALL (risk = hazard x exposure).

It's important to note, however, that even this elevated risk equated to a low chance of serious complications and only related to minor complications.»

«At this point, we've identified a hazard to amphibians, but we still need to tease apart whether or not that hazard equates to a true environmental risk.»

In one study of this effect, people rated cancer as riskier when told that it «kills 1286 people out of 10,000» than when told it «kills 24.14 people out of 100», even though the second statement equates to almost double the risk (Applied Cognitive Psychology, vol 11, p 495).

I have a high risk tolerance, get bored with the same - ole - same - ole, and love change and new horizons; how on earth could that equate with the cautiousness of a Bear?

Bad news for those with a sweet tooth: added sugars equates to added risk of heart disease.

A recent report equated a 10 % increase in processed carbs meant a 12 % increase in your cancer risk.

If we equate de facto ketogenic diets with high - protein diets (which is not always correct) then the risks proposed by critics of this type of dietary approach are essentially those of possible kidney damage due to high levels of nitrogen excretion during protein metabolism, which can cause an increase in glomerular pressure and hyperfiltration.12 There is not wide agreement between studies; however, some infer the possibility of renal damage from animal studies, 99, 100 whereas others, looking at both animal models, meta - analyses and human studies, propose that even high levels of protein in the diet do not damage renal function.101, 102 In subjects with intact renal function, higher dietary protein levels caused some functional and morphological adaptations without negative effects.103 There may actually be renal - related effects, but on blood pressure rather than morphological damage.

This equates to a risk reduction of 2.02 percent / g of fiber.

A careful assessment of what language is being used to describe such concepts should also be undertaken — «risky» does not have the same meaning as «dangerous», yet research shows primary school children equate the two, while teenagers associate risk with anti-authoritarian behaviour.

A careful assessment of what language is being used to describe such concepts should also be undertaken --- «risky» does not have the same meaning as «dangerous», yet research shows primary school children equate the two, while teenagers associate risk with anti-authoritarian behaviour.

Nonetheless, absent a more perfect method for identifying teacher excellence (e.g., teacher effectiveness indices as measured by teachers» effects on student academic growth), the research team chose to accept the risk of equating national teacher awards with teacher excellence.

As senior research scientist at ATI, she oversees all aspects of psychometric analyses of Galileo assessments, including the application of Item Response Theory, test equating procedures, and inferential statistics in order to evaluate student ability, monitor student growth, identify students at risk, and evaluate educator effectiveness.

Perhaps most offensive of all, we equate the need for high stakes testing, and command - and - control policies, with the obligation to ensure the protection of the civil rights for our most at - risk children without any conversation about the funding, or even more necessary, accountability for those holding others accountable.

Nice investigation, and I think it matches common wisdon: that a diversified portfolio including bonds doesn't hurt returns that much, but reduces volatility (some equate with risk) quite a bit.

Lower risk investments equate to safer investments.

Therefore, a lower credit score can equate to being a higher risk, and vice versa.

Many folks equate volatility with risk.

It doesn't fit to always equate debt size with risk.

«The real question is does the deletion of these public records equate to better credit risk?

The FICO scoring system will equate this activity to higher risk.

The future of insurance is in understanding that new distribution channels need not equate to additional risk, and in choosing the right partners to put those channels into place.

There is a view that over the long run, market prices in markets populated by OPMIs will reflect «true value» and, thus, market risk will be equated with investment risk.

Low risk investments equate to safer investments.

But as Alan Fustey explains in his book, Risk, Financial Markets & You, there's a big problem with equating volatility with rRisk, Financial Markets & You, there's a big problem with equating volatility with riskrisk.

As you can see, the underwater borrower has a LTV ratio greater than 100 % (this equates to negative equity), which is a major problem from a risk point of view.

Higher FICO ® scores represent lower credit risks, which typically equate to better loan terms.

Higher FICO ® scores represents lower credit risks, which typically equate to better loan terms.

A note on volatility: We don't believe volatility equates to risk and that few investors care about upside volatility.

One of the real head - scratchers for me is how (and why) anybody would equate volatility with risk.