Sentences with phrase «equation above»

So, assume the cap rate stays the same and I'm able to increase the NOI even modestly per the equation above, the market value will almost exponentially increase.

Using the equation above, we see that the minimum VA rating we'd want for our 400w needs would be a 640 VA rated system.

If you are wondering what part 3 of the equation above is, it's people.

Rewriting the equation above as Q = (CS / A) * p Substituting the proper geometric values for the real earth and sun we get Q = (πR (b) ^ 2 / 4πD (ab) ^ 2) * p Which is my equation 8)

Sorry, the sigh before H in the equation above is incorrect.

(34) into the equation above and you will get (37).

The point is that our main result, see the equation above, can be obtained from independent considerations that do not involve the continuity equation or Eq.

All of them are hydrostatic — in perfect force balance — by construction, they satisfy the differential equation above for the balance of buoyant forces in a fluid.

If that point is known (yes I know it won't be a sharpt break between convection and radiation, but let's keep it simple), then the equation above can be used to find the increase in surface temperature resulting from an isentropic near surface atmosphere.

The climate sensitivity and the shape of the net flux vs temperature profile is FULLY DETERMINED by the basic energy balance equation above — no matter how you decide to partition the rate of energy gain.

Cox et al.'s calculations were also based on another assumption somewhat related to different time scales for different feedback mechanisms: a constant «heat capacity» represented by C in the equation above.

Plugging S = 1367.6 and A = 0.306 into the equation above, we find that F is about 237 watts per square meter for the Earth, corresponding to an «equilibrium temperature» (or «emission temperature,» or «effective temperature») of 254 ° K. Most formulations use a slightly different S and A and get 255 ° K.

Using the equation above, your CPM, or redemption value is around 5.9 cents per point / mile.

If your staffing hours are limited, you can manipulate the staffing equation above to help you determine how much work you can reasonably take on.

From the equation above, S — C = - P.

Factor a monthly mortgage payment of $ 1000 into the equation above and suddenly it becomes 2000/5000, or 40 %.

The second part of the equation above is the simplified form of the first, which is achieved by adding similar variables.

You don't have to go for sugars if you are following the equation above.

The muscle is forced to tear (remember the equation above) but you donʼt actually need to move it.

Thus, Dr Benestad's equation above, even after my correction, can not be applied to the Earth climate system.

In order to solve the equation above given, it is necessary to know v, the velocity of the aeroplane with respect to the ground.

Perhaps more significantly from our point of view, however, is that the equation above and the Einstein mass - energy equivalence in some sense redefine the concept of mass away from any intuitive interpretation.

The equations above are exactly the same as those used for our Daily Caloric Expenditure Calculator, except that the «Activity Level Factor» that is used for the Daily Caloric Expenditure Calculator has been removed here.

I think one minor omission in the equations above is inflation.

If you've ever taken an algebra course, you can see that the system of equations above looks like this matrix equation:

But even for that box, I am not seeing a number that I could plug into the equations above.

Craig, based on your equations above, you seem to be suggesting that live has no value to you, only work.

Not exact matches

It's not a reality show where you are the star, and if you're focused on delivering results and impact, then you should separate yourself from the equation and think of how the team can meet the objective above.

Finally, by substituting the historic linear trend above into the IRR term of this equation, and the industry average investment period of 13 years into the c term, we get the following formula, which shows that nominal R&D productivity / ROI currently stands at about 1.2 (i.e., we get only 20 % back on top of our original R&D investment after 13 years), is declining exponentially by about 10 % per year, and will hit 1.0 (zero net return on investment) by 2020:

To get an idea of the role each component of income per capita plays in the Canada — U.S. income gap, we used the equation shown above, substituting U.S. data for one component at a time, and keeping the country data for the other four components.

However, option «B» above did not get taken out of the equation because there was major opposition to it from the very beginning, as well.

Equilibrium price will move higher as the upstream factors mentioned above move into the supply equation.

It's because there are two sides to the risk / reward equation (as stated above) and just focusing on one side can be DANGEROUS!

Now I know that, when dealing with infinities, the math comes out as undefined most the time, but any laymen can see in the above equation that infinity / infinity is greater than 0 / infinity.

If the above formula gives results which are discrepant with observation, it would be quite possible with my general theory of nature to adopt Einstein's formula, based upon his differential equations, for the determination of the gravitational field.

The immediate inference to be made from the fact that the four equations described just above lead to a contradiction is either (a) that one or more of the equations is false or (b) that it is somehow illegitimate to combine them algebraically in the way Stapp does in arriving at the contradiction.

Now that everybody has played at least seven games, and preseason projections are completely filtered out of the equation, what you're seeing above is entirely based on 2017 data.

There are other things I find offensive as well, like Janna mentioned above, the mother does not seem to be included in the equation at all.

Elvis's equation — shown above and detailed in an upcoming edition of Planetary and Space Science — works in a similar way.

This means we can rewrite the above geometric identity as the equation

When you apply this formula to the above equation, you get the two answers:

The study's ultimate product was a mathematical equation or formula that included as variables the length of the fall, the length of rope between the carabiner and climber, the climber's height above the carabiner, the maximum elongation or the rope, the mass of the climber and acceleration due to gravity.

But Laplace's theory is perfectly applicable to the atmosphere if ocean depth in the tidal equation is replaced by a quantity called equivalent depth, characterizing the extent of the atmosphere above the surface.

Even at the time, with scientific meteorology still in its infancy, the idea seemed absurd: key equations governing the behaviour of the 5 million billion tonnes of air above us had already been identified — and they were anything but simple.

Each velocity of the aeroplane and each height will, when substituted in the above equation, give a different triangle and, consequently, a different value for the angle, a. Substituting for every possible height and every possible speed will give a series of values for this angle which may be easily tabulated.

Going back to Equation 1, as mentioned above, catalysts are needed to efficiently split water because all water - splitting schemes require the inefficient step of producing oxygen.

From equation (11), and assuming τ0 = 6 d (as above), we see that for the Space Warps crowd to be able to classify 108 images of photometrically selected massive galaxies and groups in approximately 60 d, it would need to contain 107 volunteers.

Using this equation, CotSS = 328 ng / mL (see above), CLcot = 0.52 mL / min, measured in 25 g C57BL / 6 mice (Siu & Tyndale, 2006), R = 1.09, and assuming that the body weight of C57BL / 6 mice used in the discussed study was 25g (we were unable to find the body weight in the paper), Ko nic can be calculated as 583 ng / 25g / min (2.1 mg / kg / 90 min).

Since there is evidence (as mentioned above) that high levels may not be a big factor in the heart disease equation, shouldn't we be more focused on reducing rates of heart disease itself rather than just lowering cholesterol levels?

As the above equation is intended for bodybuilders in a steady, maintainable state, special adjustments should be made for «bulking» off - season bodybuilders who, due to heavy food and liquid intake, often carry additional pounds of «lean body mass» in the form of fluid retention, labile proteins and contents in the digestive tract.