Sentences with phrase «equilibrate by»

For example, the ocean temperature may have equilibrated by that time.

Fc = W ^ 2 * rc — centrifugal force at local barycenter (Earth - Moon); it's of course, equilibrated by gravity of third body: Fc = W ^ 2 * rc = G (M + m3) / d ^ 3 * d m3 / (M + m3) = Gm3 / d ^ 2 = F3; M = m1 + m2;

Not exact matches

The atmospheric greenhouse effect, an idea that authors trace back to the traditional works of Fourier 1824, Tyndall 1861, and Arrhenius 1896, and which is still supported in global climatology, essentially describes a fictitious mechanism, in which a planetary atmosphere acts as a heat pump driven by an environment that is radiatively interacting with but radiatively equilibrated to the atmospheric system.

When taken by individuals who have mercury dental amalgams or a body burden of mercury, alpha lipoic acid can pull mercury from the teeth and other tissues in an attempt to equilibrate levels throughout the body and brain.

The atmospheric greenhouse effect, an idea that authors trace back to the traditional works of Fourier 1824, Tyndall 1861, and Arrhenius 1896, and which is still supported in global climatology, essentially describes a fictitious mechanism, in which a planetary atmosphere acts as a heat pump driven by an environment that is radiatively interacting with but radiatively equilibrated to the atmospheric system.

You will remember James Lovelock writing, that by consideration of the planetary atmospheres of Mars and Venus with thermodynamically equilibrated products, they are dead planets, at least they are so now.

Solar forcing has increased over the 20th century and given that the oceans have not yet had time to equilibrate to the new levels of forcing, it must have contributed some to the recent warming, in fact, that equlibration was further delayed by the cooling period, so the unrealized climate commitment would have been greater than ordinarily expected given that most of the increase in solar activity occurred in the first half of the century.

I understand that bottom ocean does not equilibrate with 5000C of Earth crust because of slow mixing with colder water coming from arctic, as explained by michael sweet@11, thanks!.

If the particle stays long enough in a small volume to interact with other particles in this small volume, for example by collisions, then the particle will equilibrate with others.

An adiabatically isolated gas initially prepared in a state with an adiabatic lapse rate will thermally equilibrate due to the internal conduction of heat within the gas by all mechanisms and relax to precisely this state.

He won't acknowledge that in static force equilibrium (after Jelbring's very long time) there is no bulk transport of parcels of gas and hence conductivity has an infinite amount of time to increase the entropy of the gas by equilibrating the temperature.

However, most of the methane produced from dissociating marine hydrates will be consumed by anaerobic processes in the top few metres of sulphate - rich near - sea - floor sediments and all of the rest will be dissolved and oxidized in sea water and will not be released to the atmosphere as methane, although the dissolved CO2 will equilibrate with atmosphere after a few centuries.

Why isn't a TCR type of simulation, but instead using actual history and 200 year projected GHG levels in the atmosphere, that would produce results similar to a TCR simulation (at least for the AGW temp increase that would occur when the CO2 level is doubled) and would result in much less uncertainty than ECS (as assessed by climate model dispersions), a more appropriate metric for a 300 year forecast, since it takes the climate more than 1000 years to equilibrate to the hypothesized ECS value, and we have only uncertain methods to check the computed ECS value with actual physical data?

Dissolved CO2 and CH4 concentrations in surface waters were obtained by equilibrating 2 L of water with 20 mL of ambient air for 3 minutes.

Alternatively, one could demonstrate empirically by experiment that raising the CO2 concentration of an equilibrated atmosphere has no net effect, although this would obviously be a difficult experiment to perform.

Discrepancies in the glacial climate simulations are further amplified by short integration times, as the deep ocean equilibrates on millennial timescales.

«The atmospheric greenhouse effect, an idea that many authors trace back to the traditional works of Fourier 1824, Tyndall 1861, and Arrhenius 1896, and which is still supported in global climatology, essentially describes a fictitious mechanism, in which a planetary atmosphere acts as a heat pump driven by an environment that is radiatively interacting with but radiatively equilibrated to the atmospheric system.

You said between the lines in # 270: «as you equilibrate», «by the time you get there», all sounds like now you are talking about a transient process, while in # 269 you said «that equilibrium state... happens to absorb more LW than you started with» (which I read as an absorption process related to the state of equilibrium).

«[The greenhouse theory] essentially describes a fictitious mechanism, in which a planetary atmosphere acts as a heat pump driven by an environment that is radiatively interacting with but radiatively equilibrated to the atmospheric system.

The way I interpret that is that the higher climate sensitivity must either involve different heat transfer modes / patterns, or that it involves a different temperature rise path, with more of the increase backloaded (ie if most of the increase for high sensitivity comes after 2070, then there's less time for the oceans to equilibrate than there would be, if most of the temperature increase was done by 2030).

While it is no perfect solution either (and there probably is none), the Advocate General's solution of doing exactly the same thing the other way round — offering the action for damages as consolation for the party that has previously benefitted from an erroneous transformation of EU law by the Member State and now pays the price because of horizontal direct effect excluding the application of a norm of national law they had relied on — has at least a somewhat more equilibrated approach towards sharing the burden of advantages and disadvantages.