Sentences with phrase «equilibrates on»

Discrepancies in the glacial climate simulations are further amplified by short integration times, as the deep ocean equilibrates on millennial timescales.

That layer does not, as IPCC claims, equilibrate on a time scale of a year or any other length of time.

Not exact matches

This is also important, because otherwise the temperatures on either side would equilibrate, and no voltage would remain.

This simple analysis shows that the «2 degree target» of «dangerous anthropogenic interference» is looming on the horizon, as the climate equilibrates and aerosol pollution is cleaned up.

This is basically me on most days, but I feel like I've equilibrated to the point where it doesn't feel that crazy - hectic to me anymore.

Description: Logo equilibrate frames the Tied - around top zip on this midget LeSportsac pouch.

The authors speculate that the main reason hurricanes show this delta is that more of the precipitation is coming from high altitude (depleted in O - 18 based on gravitational potential) and in the form of large drops that do not have time to equilibrate wrt O - 18 in lower regions of the cloud as they fall.

The reasons are also based on the physics, which require that initial equilibration involves the rapidly equilibrating sinks in the ocean mixed layer and some terrestrial sources, while the overall decay rate that involves slower equilibration with larger sinks is much slower.

In 100 to 300 years, we could produce a signal on Earth that takes tens of thousands of years to equilibrate, judging from the geologic record.»

If the CO2 concentration were to be stabilized to 400pmm from now on, the sea levels would be expected continue to rise for a couple more centuries — though at a slowing rate — before they equilibrate to current concentrations.

This wandering is entirely reversible: when there are large droplets to condense on, temperature equilibrates to the value of T for which water molecules are condensing on and evaporating from droplets in equal numbers, just as in any reversible chemical reaction.

Most attention in the debate over climate change has been based on the assumption of a gradual increase in mean global temperatures, equilibrating to a new higher level some decades after concentrations of greenhouse gases have stabilized, with effects that will then play out for centuries.

Because the chemistry of the ocean equilibrates with that of the atmosphere (on time scales of decades to centuries), methane oxidized to CO2 in the water column will eventually increase the atmospheric CO2 burden (Archer and Buffett, 2005).

Ironically, it is exactly because aerosol forcing is so uncertain and because the climate hasn't equilibrated yet that the observed warming since pre-industrial times is only a very weak constraint on climate sensitivity.

On the other hand, if we imagine a case where the planet actually equilibrates at some warmer temperature, then there would be an energy difference proportional to the difference in global temperature — and that difference would be quasi-permanent, in line with the notion that energy was «trapped» in the system.

While it is no perfect solution either (and there probably is none), the Advocate General's solution of doing exactly the same thing the other way round — offering the action for damages as consolation for the party that has previously benefitted from an erroneous transformation of EU law by the Member State and now pays the price because of horizontal direct effect excluding the application of a norm of national law they had relied on — has at least a somewhat more equilibrated approach towards sharing the burden of advantages and disadvantages.