I think that all they represent is the temperature of the atmosphere when it is in
equilibrium at any given level.
Not exact matches
In full
equilibrium,
at any
given level, there may be some net radiative heating
at some frequencies compensated by some net radiative cooling
at other frequencies, with convection balancing the full spectrum radiative cooling of the troposphere and heating of the surface.
In the real climate system,
at any particular time the actual change in climate would lag behind the corresponding
equilibrium change for any
given CO2
level, largely because of the thermal inertia of the oceans.
However it does still mean that temperatures rise — and
at any
given level of CO2 forcing this effect will mean a higher
equilibrium temperature.
As for
equilibrium, the system is never
at equilibrium, but the incoming energy
level is fairly constant, so the system should remain within a
given temperature range,
given the negative feedbacks operating during any excursions.
I am trying to get used to using W / M ^ 2 as equivalent to temperature — I agree it simplifies the explanation and,
at the end of the day, any
given level of
equilibrium energy flux corresponds to an
equilibrium temperature but still...
At that thermal equilibrium the surface temperature can be calculated using the S - B Law for any planet at a given level of solar inpu
At that thermal
equilibrium the surface temperature can be calculated using the S - B Law for any planet
at a given level of solar inpu
at a
given level of solar input.