Sentences with word «equillibrium»

remove it all, it will quickly reach equillibrium.

I am under impression that all current climate models can't see farther than their nose of returning to «global equillibrium» after perturbation in «forcing», any substantial excursions of state trajectories are dismissed as numerical errors, so the global glaciation - deglaciation episodes have no support in current global climate models.

Maybe simply because your current assumption of globally - stable equillibrium failed to explain any of critical events in climate history?

In a science of nonlinear dynamics it means that the system is out of equillibrium, in constant dynamics, so the climate components are continuously OUT OF BALANCE.

Paperback books will naturally experience a decline until they will reach an equillibrium with the newer technologies.