In classic terms equity works on a party's conscience; and Sumner J's analysis of H's position provides a good example of the operation of
equitable principles in the field of family law.
Other than the doctrine of constructive trust, it is possible in certain circumstances to apply other
equitable principles such as proprietary estoppel.
In this case, the Court of Appeal proceeds on the basis the rule had no application,
determined equitable principles, and the parties» agreement ruled it out.
The Federal Court, relied on Nor - Man Regional Health Authority Inc v Manitoba Association of Health Care Professionals, 2011 SCC 59, to hold that the use of
equitable principles by the adjudicator was both reasonable and correct.
A recent decision of the Federal Court has confirmed that adjudicators acting under the wrongful dismissal provisions of the Canada Labour Code can
apply equitable principles in determining jurisdiction.
Although the website is very helpful to both help visualize and understand facts relevant to determinations of
what equitable principles should guide national climate policy formation, particularly in regard to ghg emissions reduction targets, lamentably the site could be interpreted to leave the mistaken impression that equity could mean anything.
Instead, the claim flowed
from equitable principles entitling a guarantor to be subrogated to the claims of its payee, and as such, the selling shareholder's claim was one founded only in debt and nothing more.
Property is distinguished by whether it is separate, or pre-marital and generally not divisible, or marital and subject to division based
upon equitable principles.
It only becomes a relevant factor if it included dissipation of marital property;
then equitable principles would favor the innocent spouse.
His decision was made in the Family Division, but — many years after the disposal of financial issues between the parties — was decided
on equitable principles.
Not on
equitable principles, said the court:
Then you are thrown back on common law and
equitable principles.
The doctrine of resulting trust is
an equitable principle which steps in to correct what would otherwise be an injustice.
In Stack v Dowden Baroness Hale stated that
those equitable principles were replaced by TOLATA 1996, ss 12 and 13.
Prior to the enactment of the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996 (TOLATA 1996) such issues were determined by
the equitable principles of «equitable accounting» or «equitable compensation».
This equitable principle gives rise to a presumption the son received the money on a resulting trust, which is a rebuttable presumption of law.
Historically, there were separate «courts of equity,» but today, most courts have «equity jurisdiction,» i.e., they can apply «
equitable principles» to cases, including divorce.
One could be forgiven for believing that Dunsmuir sought only to recognize a correctness category with respect to the application of common law and
equitable principles while making room for the exceptional case; those where the tribunal had developed an expertise in the application of a particular common law or equitable principle.
But, as has already been highlighted, reliance on such
equitable principles is uncertain, complex and does not exclusively protect the interests of cohabiting couples upon a breakdown of their relationship.
Family law is complex and highly fact - specific, and involves the application of common law and
equitable principles, a host of case authorities, as well as legislation.
Equitable principles When relationships break down between cohabiting couples, it is necessary to turn to
equitable principles to establish a benefi cial interest for one cohabiting party.
The new edition is therefore most welcome in its detailed yet approachable discussion of
the equitable principles applicable in proceedings under the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996 and under the inherent jurisdiction in relation to personalty.
This is because I believe the «law» is a distillation of
equitable principles.