Ordering an employer to take back a worker is a form of the extraordinary
equitable remedy called «specific performance» of the employment contract.
Not exact matches
In the even that you have missed the two limitation period, you still have an opportunity to pursue so
called «
equitable remedies» such as «unjust enrichment» and «constructive trusts».
E.g. Bloggs v. Snooks is quite evidently a civil matter involving mostly likely a private law dispute between two parties where there needs to be a judgment and a legal
remedy; Re Bloggs Estate on the other hand is an
equitable cause of action where this is no lis between the parties, and is mostly likely
calling on the court for the interpretation of the terms of a will.
Consequently, the case can be distinguished from one in which validity is challenged by a party to the agreement, where
equitable remedies (eg proprietary estoppel) might be
called upon to rescue a formally defective agreement.