Now, nearly four decades later, Connecticut still doesn't have a fair and
equitable school financing system.
The Commission recommended more
equitable school financing systems, measures to ensure effective teachers and curriculum, and access to high quality early childhood education.
By contrast, Education Trust's report, reflecting the effect of Abbott, ranked the Garden State as the second most
equitable school finance system in the country.
California's new Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF) 1, signed into law in 2013, promised a new school finance system that would provide both more local control and a more
equitable school finance system.
LCFF was designed as a step towards a more
equitable school finance system.
As you consider the governor's proposed changes, we ask that you take these areas for improvement into consideration, and continue to take steps toward a truly
equitable school finance system for all of Connecticut's public school students.
As you consider the governor's proposal and possible adjustments to the FY 2019 budget, we ask that you take these areas for improvement into consideration, and continue to take steps toward a truly
equitable school finance system for all of Connecticut's public school students.
And they have a chance to push Connecticut toward
an equitable school finance system that works for all students and meets their learning needs and the needs of their schools and communities.
Connecticut's low - income students need and deserve
an equitable school finance system that recognizes, and takes into account, the variety of challenges they may face that can impact their educational success.
College access advocates need to develop long - term structural solutions to these disparities such as
equitable school finance laws and more generous financial aid policies.
Not exact matches
It would certainly appear
equitable, in light of the tortured history of
school -
finance litigation in Ohio.
Many of the individuals who are driving education policy in this country... sent their own children to abundantly
financed private
schools where class sizes were 16 or less, and yet continue to insist that resources,
equitable funding, and class size don't matter — when all the evidence points to the contrary (Haimson, 2009).
The state's charter law must support new and high - performing operators; the state's
school finance system must provide
equitable, student - based funding; facilities must be made available to new and growing
schools; educator certification rules must fit the needs of successful
schools; and so on.
The long - term funding solution is twofold:
equitable funding and access to publicly
financed school facilities.
One might think that the same voters who wanted to reform
school districts would also want to reform the
school finance behemoth — assuming they understood that 66 might make
school finance more
equitable, targeted and transparent.
This document presents a brief explanation of the goal of
school finance reforms, followed by summaries of the main bodies of evidence that illustrate how
equitable and adequate
school funding improves student outcomes.
Do state
school finance reforms that provide more
equitable and adequate funding matter?
«Connecticut needs and deserves an
equitable school -
finance system that is based on the learning needs of students, and the
schools that serve them.»
In a few weeks, Governor Doug Ducey's Classrooms First Initiative Council will take the first, small step towards creating an
equitable, efficient state
school finance system that benefits all of our students.
In this way, the general assembly established a relatively
equitable system of
financing school general operating expenses supported by a uniform system of local property taxation.
While not every dollar a
school spends directly improves academic outcomes, a new report from Rutgers
school -
finance expert Bruce Baker finds certain kinds of money very much do matter: extra funding for higher teacher salaries and more
equitable distribution of resources between rich and poor districts, for example, are correlated with higher student achievement, especially for the neediest kids.
At the same time, states are increasingly focused on developing more
equitable K — 12 education
financing systems, including reducing funding disparities between districts and providing additional funding for high - poverty
school districts.
To me, it's completely unrelated to the agenda from Brown, which was about getting equal access to educational opportunities for students — you know, initially through desegregation, but the heritage of Brown is also a large number of
school finance reform lawsuits that have been trying to advocate for
equitable resource distribution between districts and
schools.
Former Texas Solicitor General James Ho made the case for
equitable funding for public charter
school students and TCSA General Counsel Denise Pierce drove the point home at the
school finance trial before the Supreme Court of -LSB-...]
a
school finance formula based on individual student needs, which provides adequate and
equitable funding for public
schools, and is funded through a balanced tax policy at both the state and local levels.
Such a study is the necessary first step to developing a rational, effective and constitutional education funding and
finance system that provides a truly adequate and
equitable educational opportunity to every K - 12 public
school student in Connecticut.
Recent research out of the Madison - based Wisconsin Policy Forum shows Wisconsin ranks high nationally for providing adequate funding in an
equitable way to K - 12
schools — although researchers acknowledge the state's
school finance system has its challenges, after «years of layering new programs and funding methods on top of one another.»
The recently completed state budget was made tough because of a lack of revenues; positive
school finance reform requires adequate, sustainable and
equitable revenue sources.
Many of the individuals who are driving education policy in this country, including New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, Jeb Bush and Bill Gates, sent their own children to abundantly
financed private
schools where class sizes were 16 or less, and yet continue to insist that resources,
equitable funding, and class size don't matter — when all the evidence points to the contrary.