Sentences with phrase «equity debt regardless»

You can also deduct the interest on up to $ 100,000 of home equity debt regardless of how you use the loan proceeds.

Not exact matches

Homeowners also may deduct interest paid on up to $ 100,000 of home equity debt, regardless of how they use the borrowed funds.

Regardless of the somewhat mixed results with the debt - to - equity ratio, the company's quick ratio of 1.11 is sturdy.

Under prior law, the deduction was limited to interest paid on the first $ 100,000 of home equity debt, regardless of how the proceeds were used.

You can also generally deduct interest on home equity debt of up to $ 100,000 ($ 50,000 if you're married and file separately) regardless of how you use the loan proceeds.

However, if a company is adding debt to pay dividends (for example), there is no collateral and I will worry about the sustainability of this business practice regardless of the current debt / equity ratio.

Regardless of how the business raises financial capital, several types of debt and equity instruments exist.

The second intuitive way to view it is that it is analogous to Modiglani and Miller's capital structure theory, where assets return the same regardless of how they are financed with equity and debt.

He recommended that an investor create a portfolio of a minimum of 30 stocks meeting specific price - to - earnings criteria (below 10) and specific debt - to - equity criteria (below 50 percent) to give the «best odds statistically,» and then hold those stocks until they had returned 50 percent, or, if a stock hadn't met that return objective by the «end of the second calendar year from the time of purchase, sell it regardless of price.»

Anyway, I might disagree with your whole thesis, regardless — emerging markets are no more dangerous than developed markets: Yes, people always fearfully imagine losing 100 % of their investment in an emerging market — and v rarely that can happen — but they prefer to ignore the fact that in the credit crisis, on their own doorstep, they lost all their home equity, 50 % of their stock portfolio, and the rest was confiscated in taxes & unsustainable future tax / entitleement / debt burdens...

Why do I even bother... but it hardly needs pointing out we're talking about stocks whose business is inherently low / steady growth — can these muppets not figure out that high CAGRs obviously come from a constant diet of investment & acquisitions (regardless of the potential returns on offer), all funded by serial equity & debt issuance.

With reverse mortgages the loan pays you over time, and is available regardless of your current income and debt to equity ratio, unlike the other types of loans.

Regardless of the person's income, debt or any other criteria, so long as the person currently lived in the home and had significant equity, they could get approved.

This is true regardless of when the home equity debt was incurred.