First, the notion of «equity» applied in Quebec law is
equity in its general sense and is connected to concerns for «fairness in contract.»
Not exact matches
The
general consensus is that buying and holding stocks for the long term tends to work out, and that it makes
sense to have higher risk exposures (think
equities)
in your younger years.
Rice «methodically tied Blanchard
in knots over how to interpret the proslavery implications of specific texts» while «Blanchard returned repeatedly to «the broad principle of common
equity and common
sense» that he found
in Scripture, to «the
general principles of the Bible» and «the whole scope of the Bible»» rather than specifics.
As progressives, it makes
sense that union leaders would support
equity in general, but there's no good reason for why that moral impulse should stop at school district borders.
Personally, I don't believe we are anywhere near bubble levels for
equities, at least
in the
general sense.
In a
general sense, the earlier assessments are still valid, but the assessments have become much more complete over time, evolving from making very simple,
general statements about sectoral impacts, through greater concern with regions regarding observed and projected impacts and associated vulnerabilities, through to an enhanced emphasis on sustainability and
equity, with a deeper examination of adaptation options.