If those are the ones you are speaking about:: «Those who cried exclusivity and established boundaries and drew lines of distinction and
erected walls of separation are clearly those Jesus challenged,» then that sounds suspiciously like exclusion.
NP said: Those who cried exclusivity and established boundaries and drew lines of distinction and
erected walls of separation are clearly those Jesus challenged.
Whereas the fundamentalists and integralists want to unite the spiritual power and the temporal power, Francis wants to
erect a wall of separation between the two.
Not exact matches
Neither can pass laws which aid one religion, aid all religions, or prefer one religion to another... in the words
of Jefferson, the [First Amendment] clause against establishment
of religion by law was intended to
erect «a
wall of separation between church and State»... That
wall must be kept high and impregnable.
If a
wall of separation is
erected between religion and the state (and its schools), that
wall will prove to be a tomb in which church, state, and schools will decay with a civilization that has lost its soul.
Erecting the «
wall of separation between church and state,» therefore, is absolutely essential in a free society.
But the Court also unanimously adopted the language
of Justice Hugo Black in the same case: «The clause [no establishment
of religion] was intended to
erect «a
wall of separation» between church and state.»