Sentences with phrase «erector spinae during»

Intervention — any acute study assessing the muscle activity of the erector spinae during the deadlift exercise

Comparing barbell squat variations, Aspe et al. (2014) explored the erector spinae during back squats and overhead squats with loads equal to 60, 75 and 90 % of 3RM.

Comparing the effect of load, Vigotsky et al. (2014) explored the muscle activity of the lumbar (at L3) and thoracic (at T9) erector spinae during the good morning exercise performed with varying relative loads (50 — 90 % of 1RM).

Intervention — any acute study assessing the muscle activity of the erector spinae during the split squat exercise

Not exact matches

Heavier loads, faster bar speeds, and greater depth (with the same relative load), all lead to increased erector spinae muscle activity during back squats.

Assessing the effects of cues, Bressel et al. (2009) found that conscious efforts to contract the abdominal muscles during squats did not affect the muscle activity of the erector spinae.

Noe et al. (1992) assessed erector spinae muscle activity during an isokinetic machine deadlift, and found that erector spinae muscle activity peaked at 83 % of lift height, which was after the point where peak force output was produced (67 % of lift).

During many traditional core exercises (like plank and push - up variations, leg raises, and abdominal roll - outs), erector spinae muscle activity is low.

Jackson et al. (2008) compared the COV of the EMG amplitude (linear envelope) in the thoracic and lumbar erector spinae between MVICs and SVICs, during prone, seated, and standing trunk flexion tasks.

Assessing the effects of equipment, Escamilla et al. (2002) explored erector spinae muscle activity (at L3) during conventional and sumo deadlifts with and without a weightlifting belt.

Several studies have assessed erector spinae muscle activity during compound exercises.

Additionally, they reported superior lower erector spinae muscle activity during the bent over row and inverted row compared to the standing cable row.

When performing the squat variations with 90 % of 3RM, muscle activity of the erector spinae was superior in the back squat during the ascending phase (94.7 ± 20.8 vs. 79.8 ± 22.5 % of MVC) while there was no difference during the descending phase (72.1 ± 22.2 vs. 69.7 ± 13.5), respectively.

Comparing the effect external resistance type, Saeterbakken et al. (2014) explored erector spinae muscle activity during the back squat with 6RM loads using either a barbell or a combination of a barbell and elastic resistance (where elastic resistance comprised between 25 — 40 % total load, depending on the phase of the lift).

They reported no difference in either upper or lower erector spinae muscle activity during the ascending phase of the lift.

During squats, training with higher loads and faster speeds appear to maximise erector spinae muscle activity, while internal cues, unstable surfaces, using barbells with elastic resistance, changing footwear, or using a weightlifting belt do not affect erector spinae muscle activity.

Comparing compound and stability exercises, Comfort et al. (2011) explored lower erector spinae muscle activity during the back squat, front squat, the standing barbell press, plank and superman on a swiss ball.

Comparing a range of compound exercises, McAllister et al. (2014) explored erector spinae muscle activity during the leg curl, good morning, glute - ham raise, and Romanian deadlift with 85 % of 1RM.

The erector spinae is highly active during a number of less traditional exercises, including the log - lift and tire - flip strongman events, but the sled push exercise produces lower muscle activity than the back squat.

The highest erector spinae muscle activity is displayed as the bar is lowered during the descending phase until its peak, but erector spinae muscle activity is similar throughout the whole of the ascending phase.

Nuzzo et al. (2008) compared the upper (at L1) and lower (at L5) erector spinae muscle activity during the birddog, hip bridge with feet on swiss ball, and back extension from a swiss ball.

Lower erector spinae muscle activity is very high during both back squats and deadlifts.

Assessing the effect of surface stability during back squats, Bressel et al. (2009) explored erector spinae muscle activity during the barbell back squat with 50 % of 1RM both when standing on the floor and when standing on a BOSU ball.

Comparing the effect of external resistance type, Vinstrup et al. (2015) explored erector spinae muscle activity during a machine trunk rotation exercise and a standing torso twist exercise with elastic resistance.

During deadlifts, training with faster speeds, using conventional or sumo deadlift technique, introducing an unstable surface, and using a weightlifting belt do not affect erector spinae muscle activity.

Assessing different whole - body exercises, McGill et al. (2014) explored upper and lower erector spinae muscle activity during the hanging leg raise (straight - leg and bent - leg), the hand walk - out, and body - saw with a suspension system.

Assessing the effects of stability during split squats, Andersen et al. (2014) explored erector spinae muscle activity in the split squat with the foot placed on the floor or on a foam cushion, using 6RM.

During the squat, training with higher loads and faster speeds appear to increase erector spinae muscle activity, while internal cues, unstable surfaces, using both barbells and elastic resistance, altering footwear, and using a weightlifting belt do not affect erector spinae muscle activity.

Comparing the back squat and the sled, Maddigan et al. (2014) compared the erector spinae muscle activity during the back squat performed with 10RM and the weighted sled push at a 20 step maximum.

They reported no difference in erector spinae muscle activity between the two squat variations despite a greater absolute load being lifted during the back squat.

Assessing the effects of upper or lower body movement, Kim et al. (2015) explored erector spinae muscle activity during isometric hip extension exercises performed with either the upper or lower body moving and with either neutral or maximal lumbar and hip extension.

Therefore, it appears that erector spinae muscle activity is higher during deeper squats compared to shallower squats.

Yavus et al. (2015) assessed erector spinae muscle activity during back and front squats with 1RM.

Therefore, the data appears to indicate that the erector spinae displays superior muscle activity during the second half of the conventional deadlift and not necessarily at the same point as the region in which maximum force is exerted.

During the 1 handed swing, the opposite side (from the kettlebell hand) upper erector spinae displayed superior muscle activity compared to the kettlebell side (35 ± 15 vs. 42 ± 13 %), while there was no difference in lower erector spinae muscle activity between sides.

The «leg biceps» - femoris biceps - and the erector spinae in the lower back worked less hard during the trap bar deadlift.

When controlling for relative load, bar speed does not affect erector spinae muscle activity during deadlifts.