Spoor notes that the paucity of the fossil record means that many conjectures about Homo
erectus remain unproven.
Not exact matches
Paleontologists have long noted strange grooves near the gum line on dental
remains dating back to Homo
erectus, «but it was assumed they couldn't be from tooth picking, because they never show up on contemporary human
remains,» Hlusko says.
The new
remains — six teeth, a fragment of jawbone and a tiny piece of skull — don't settle the issue, but Yousuke Kaifu at Tokyo's National Museum of Nature and Science and his colleagues think they back the shrunken H.
erectus theory.
But whether the species Homo
erectus, meaning «upright man», should be reclassified into several distinct species
remains controversial.
The stature of S1 falls within the range of modern Homo sapiens maximum values; it also fits the available Homo
erectus sensu lato estimates based on fossil
remains (Ruff and Walker, 1993) and on footprints (Bennett et al., 2009)(Figure 12).
Also small statured, the
remains are hypothesized by the authors to be a predecessor population, possibly Homo
erectus and small statured because of the «island effect.
It belonged to an adult male of the species Homo
erectus, a.k.a. «Upright Man» and is called «Skull 5» because it was the fifth set of hominid
remains recovered at the archeological site, Dmanisi, located in the Caucausus of the Republic of Georgia.
According to one prevailing but contentious theory, the hobbits descended from the larger Homo
erectus, the first hominid to have modern human proportions, whose
remains can be found on the nearby Indonesian island of Java.
Ethnic Jordanian Jordan is rich in Paleolithic
remains, holding evidence of inhabitance by Homo
erectus, Neanderthal and modern humans.