The Church must «get it right» concerning the use and seeking of
erotic pleasure not only in marriage, but in the formative friendships of puberty, and through the teens to the early twenties.
Not exact matches
Chastity under vow is indeed a sign that sex is
not love, and that love, of its very nature, transcends sexuality and the
erotic function and
pleasure.
Even
erotic egoism can
not forbear swearing «eternal fidelity» and, for a fleeting moment, finding
pleasure in actually believing in this eternity.
People are quickly realising that
erotic toys aren't just for self -
pleasure.
Never celebrating the kitsch like one of those «90s DTV
erotic thrillers with titles like Lethally Blonde, or taking it seriously as a full - on dive into
erotic obsession, the results have been tame, mostly poor affairs,
not bad enough to be guilty
pleasures or good enough to be, well, good.
Their bite isn't deadly so they feed on willing donors, often in a cafeteria - like setting where the givers get a seemingly
erotic pleasure from being a feedbag.
I think often of Roland Barthes's question in
Pleasure of the Text: «Is
not the most
erotic portion of the body where the garment gapes?»