A professional editor can improve the readability and professional appearance of your book son typos and errata don't distract the reader.
Not exact matches
I mean, if journalists don't hold themselves to standards of accuracy, why would they take the trouble to print an
Errata column for the few minutiae they happened to miss?
Macchiarini told ScienceInsider that he
does not think any
errata are necessary, but that the final decision will be up to editors of the journals involved.
According to our growing database, more than 1,300 retractions were issued last year (and that doesn't include expressions of concern and
errata).
Here's something we don't see every day: A journal explains in an
erratum notice why it chose not to retract a paper that contains data published elsewhere.
I'm going to
do a new version of the free «Color Companion» which will have the Food Plate, plus all the book images in high - resolution color, plus the
errata and index.
«We
do our best to make our patterns error - free,» it says, though I wonder why not supply distributors with
erratum slips which could be inserted inside pattern envelopes with relative ease (surely?).
Lively and full of
errata, if not too much useful criticism or context beyond «this scared me when I was a kid» (see above for my identical contribution to this conversation), it's the preferred option over the first commentary reuniting stars Robinson and Gene Barry, who
do better than you'd expect (especially Robinson, who's evidently boned up for this project) but still just provide the usual behind - the - scenes stories.
Because, although AUTHORS would happily correct
errata in ebook format if they were allowed to — traditional publishing doesn't
do that (generally speaking, at this time.
It doesn't surprise me, then, that some
errata has been noted, or that I'm the one reporting some of it.
I'm marking your response as the answer because I
do think it's an
errata.