Sentences with phrase «error analysis based»

2) Uncertainty / error analysis based on both the uncertainties in the temperature reconstruction and in the TSI (allready mentioned here by rasmus and urs).

Not exact matches

I arrive at that figure by taking the current CON - LAB lead of 7 % in the latest polls and adding an expected 2.5 % underestimate in the Conservative lead over Labour based on my analysis of historical polling errors.

Using dual regression and seed - based analyses, we observed significantly decreased FC of the default mode network to 2 regions in the posterior medial cortex (PMC): the posterior cingulate cortex (PCC) and the left precuneus (threshold - free cluster enhancement, family-wise error corrected P < 0.05).

Specifically, for the XMRV SNP analysis, reads were initially trimmed for quality by trimming 6 bp from the 5 ′ and 3 ′ ends, trimming regions with more than a 0.1 % chance of an error per base, removing all low - quality bases, and setting the number of maximum ambiguities to 1.

This article describes how a free, web - based intelligent tutoring system, (ASSISTment), was used to create online error analysis items for preservice elementary and secondary mathematics teachers.

Based on the analysis we identified errors in 557 reports of unique individuals.

After the principle of Kalman filter was introduced, a method of vehicle tracking based on basic Kalman filter is proposed and the tracking error analysis is carried out in this paper.

Surely, if you've actually read what we've written on this, you are aware that there are no errors at all in the analysis presented in Steig et al, the problems are only with some restricted AWS stations which were used in a 2ndary consistency check, and not the central analysis upon which the conclusions are based (which uses AVHRR data, not AWS data).

Much of the conversation concerning replication often appears to be based on the idea that a large fraction of scientific errors, or incorrect conclusions or problematic results are the result of errors in coding or analysis.

It was based on observational analysis which was found to contain errors.

In the case of this Verburg and Hecky paper, to be fair to the authors, you would need to critically review a good portion of the earlier studies that provide a basis for their analysis and then you would need to cite specific errors or misinterpretations.

When an error has been observed, don't take seriously anything that can even remotely be affected by that error until the error is corrected and all following steps redone based on the corrected analysis.

Using misleading graphics based on analysis known to be in error is not acceptable for a scientist.

Alternately, they could respond by saying: (2) They disagree with Nic's analysis, (3) they agree with Nic's analysis, (4) they agree with Nic's analysis but think that the error was based in an inadvertent mistake in advanced statistical analysis, (5) they agree with Nic's analysis and agree with his implication that the mis - use of their data and findings was intentional with the purpose to deceive.

In other words, do you think that this «error» was not simply based on a misunderstanding of principles of advanced statistical analysis — but a deliberate misuse of data for the purpose to deceive?»

That basis was implicit in the error analysis and assumptions, as you wrote originally, and I don't think that use of any other justifiable regression method would have changed it.

Yesterday it emerged that GISS's analysis — based on readings from more than 3,000 measuring stations worldwide — is subject to a margin of error.

The basis of this cherry picking post by Steve would plausibly disappear if the PAGES papers had proper error analysis, because none of the studies showed any physical significance.

The curved blue lines in Figure 9 - 1 present the calibration error, or the uncertainty in predictions based on the calibration (technically the 95 percent prediction interval, which has probability 0.95 of covering the unknown temperature), which is a standard component of a regression analysis.

The considerable uncertainty associated with individual reconstructions (2 - standard - error range at the multi-decadal time scale is of the order of ± 0.5 °C) is shown in several publications, calculated on the basis of analyses of regression residuals (Mann et al., 1998; Briffa et al., 2001; Jones et al., 2001; Gerber et al., 2003; Mann and Jones, 2003; Rutherford et al., 2005; D'Arrigo et al., 2006).

First analyses of the report showed that it had glaring errors based on sloppy science and gross exaggerations (most of these critiques remained in the blogosphere at first).

Furthermore, within the broader category of family law - based claims, analysis shows that litigation - related errors are responsible for fewer claims than are other types of family law errors.

Further, in describing flaws in the data the EEOC's expert Kevin Murphy relied upon to support the disparate impact claim, the Judge labeled these reports as 1) «laughable»; 2) «based on unreliable data»; 3) «rife with analytical error»; 4) containing «a plethora of errors and analytical fallacies,» and a «mind - boggling number of errors»; 5) «completely unreliable»; 6) «so full of material flaws that any evidence of disparate impact derived from an analysis of its contents must necessarily be disregarded»; 7) «distorted»; 8) «both over and under inclusive»; 9) «cherry - picked»; 10) «worthless»; and 11) «an egregious example of scientific dishonesty.»

Implemented Quality improvement strategies based on root - cause analysis to identify knowledge gaps which resulted in a drastic decrease in both Quantity and Shipping errors.