Not exact matches
It would be a logical
error to infer that leadership as it is distributed and practiced for one leadership scenario,
such as leading a new reading initiative, would necessarily be similar to leadership
distribution across other scenarios,
such as changes made in the science curriculum.
Even at a purchase price of $ 1 billion, or close to double the current market value of BKS,
such a price would be a «rounding
error» compared to the market value of a host of internet or media companies looking for a retail presence, with the added benefit being that Barnes & Noble is already in the same fundamental business, namely the
distribution of information.
If we must regularly assess performance, let's focus on performance relative to expectation
distributions,
such as a strategy's tracking
error of returns relative to its benchmark.
One might (or might not) argue for
such a relation if the models were empirically adequate, but given nonlinear models with large systematic
errors under current conditions, no connection has been even remotely established for relating the
distribution of model states under altered conditions to decision - relevant probability
distributions... There may well exist thresholds, or tipping points (Kemp 2005), which lie within this range of uncertainty.