Sentences with phrase «errors in my book in»

I share all my secrets and trials and errors in my book in regards to recruiting others and making sales.

Not exact matches

Shift from using intuition, gut instinct, and trial and error to using a systematic process like we lay out in the book.

Ryanair was forced to cancel thousands of bookings in September after what the airline said at the time was a pilot rostering error.

He says 200,000 free downloads of the book (which was roundly criticized for plagiarism; a footnote transcription error, Anderson says) in two weeks prove the validity of pricelessness.

Robbins goes into more detail on index funds in his book «Unshakeable,» in which he explains that funds eliminate the human error — and therefore the risk — that is inherent in picking stocks individually.

The worse error in Soros book was not being too bold.

Like Alina Tugend's Better By Mistake, another book recently featured in this column, Adapt explores the role that error plays in creating successes.

Every month, he was involved in the closing the books because the CFO continued to make errors.

(Mr. Buffett says diplomatically that the book was good in many ways, but also had errors.)

People have been trying since the books of the Bible were first written to find errors or contradictions in them.

Because people would see one error in this book, therefore there might be other errors in it.

Third, the Book of Mormon abounds in textual errors, factual errors, and outright plagiarisms from other works.

Then, for several hundred years, no one but a select few even knew what was in these books, and transcribed them with errors.

and bart shouldn't even be included because of his disingenuous book about the variants of the BIble... (he never really gets down to the explicit details of what they are... thus misleading people into thinking the Bible is full of errors - for example... a verse may say «Jesus said to give all your possessions» whereas a VARIANT says «And HE says, give all your possesssions») an extremely low number of variants in the Bibel even change a thing...

Funny that Leo's omnipotent sky fairy couldn't do better than a book with so many contradictions, inconsistent translations, and blatant errors in it, to get its message out.

Funny too, that Leo's omnipotent sky fairy couldn't do better than a book with so many contradictions, inconsistent translations, and blatant errors in it, to get its message out.

Most of the 350 - plus books written by «creation scientists» consist in large part of discussions of the supposed errors of evolutionary teaching, reviewing vast amounts of technical scientific data and theory, challenging this or that piece of evidence, method of dating or use of data, while producing evidences and counterarguments of their own in favor of a young earth, recent humanity, worldwide flood, etc..

He corrects an error which he says «can be found in every text book of physics» (He is writing in 1958: I wonder if it still appears.)

The book I based this post on would call that an «error» in the text.

Learning new things is most productive with an OPEN MIND and not one looking for EXCUSES for contradictions and errors in a 2,000 - year - old book.

We do see God - inspired error in the Bible, such as in the book of Job, so is it possible there might be other such inspired and inerrant errors in Scripture?

Every writer of every book in the Bible was divinely inspired and guided in what he wrote, so every statement on every subject in the entire Bible is literally true, without error.

Bootyfunk — The last book I read about Biblical error cited more examples than there are words in the Bible.

They could point to differences in terminology and word usage, «errors» of the text which «pre date» or «post date» the author, and why certain elements of his book show clear evidence of redaction and editing.

And regardless of what you believe about the violence of God in Scripture, these books will present you with a new way of looking at things so that you no longer have to choose between accepting that God is violent or writing off the Bible as hopelessly full of error.

According to the Barna study, the percent of engagement people have with the Bible — from being engaged (reading the Bible at least four times a week), friendly (engaged with the Bible less than four times a week), neutral (read the Bible once a month or less and see the Bible as the inspired word of God, but acknowledge it can have some errors) and skeptical (see the Bible as «just another book of teachings written by men)-- has started to stabilize and return to its normal rates after the rate of skepticism increased by 4 percent to 14 percent and the rate of friendliness dropped 8 percent to 37 percent in 2011.

They read the book, found typographical errors, and suggested hundreds of changes to help clarify the argument and ideas (If you are interested in joining a future Beta Reader team, I will announce openings through the email newsletter).

You have pointed out one of the scientific errors in your old book - there are many, as well as purported moments of: «Aw, Gee, how'd he know that?»

The entire book of 1 John is engaged in this idea about good and evil, light and darkness, truth and error, and John is intent on showing his readers that based on who God is and what Jesus has done for all people, we can choose to live in love, light, and righteousness, rather than abide in hatred, darkness, and evil.

In a 2009 essay in the Chronicle of Higher Education on the fiftieth anniversary of Strunk and White's Elements of Style, Edinburgh professor Geoffrey Pullum isn't content to point out errors in that celebrated booIn a 2009 essay in the Chronicle of Higher Education on the fiftieth anniversary of Strunk and White's Elements of Style, Edinburgh professor Geoffrey Pullum isn't content to point out errors in that celebrated booin the Chronicle of Higher Education on the fiftieth anniversary of Strunk and White's Elements of Style, Edinburgh professor Geoffrey Pullum isn't content to point out errors in that celebrated booin that celebrated book.

To say that the claims that are based off of a book were created after the book was first written is just stupid (maybe your argument isn't what you typed and you made an error in trying to convey your thoughts).

Repeatedly he argued that the introduction of women priests, the new prayer book and other changes in the Episcopal Church had taken it out of the mainstream of Episcopalianism; that in fact the schismatic group, by separating itself from all that «error,» is the faithful remnant.

The first chapter of that book has too many errors in it.

In February the Jesuit theologian Roger Haight, former professor at Weston Jesuit School of Theology in Cambridge, Massachusetts, received notification that the Vatican had found «serious doctrinal errors» in his 1999 book Jesus: Symbol of God (Orbis) and that he was forbidden to teach as a Catholic theologiaIn February the Jesuit theologian Roger Haight, former professor at Weston Jesuit School of Theology in Cambridge, Massachusetts, received notification that the Vatican had found «serious doctrinal errors» in his 1999 book Jesus: Symbol of God (Orbis) and that he was forbidden to teach as a Catholic theologiain Cambridge, Massachusetts, received notification that the Vatican had found «serious doctrinal errors» in his 1999 book Jesus: Symbol of God (Orbis) and that he was forbidden to teach as a Catholic theologiain his 1999 book Jesus: Symbol of God (Orbis) and that he was forbidden to teach as a Catholic theologian.

In a review of Sherwood Wirt's influential book The Social Conscience of an Evangelical in The Reformed Journal 18 (May - June 1968): 19, Daane argues that churches can make specific social and political announcements for three reasons: (1) Protestants are not committed to belief in an infallible church and therefore can risk erroIn a review of Sherwood Wirt's influential book The Social Conscience of an Evangelical in The Reformed Journal 18 (May - June 1968): 19, Daane argues that churches can make specific social and political announcements for three reasons: (1) Protestants are not committed to belief in an infallible church and therefore can risk erroin The Reformed Journal 18 (May - June 1968): 19, Daane argues that churches can make specific social and political announcements for three reasons: (1) Protestants are not committed to belief in an infallible church and therefore can risk erroin an infallible church and therefore can risk error.

I do like the progressive Christian stance as you describe it — that there may be error in many of the books of the bible — but that people, even with our limited minds, can strive to see a more perfect vision than what was written.

In addition, the Lutheran Church - Missouri Synod said the books by Tim LaHaye and Jerry Jenkins are «filled with very serious errors about what the Bible really teaches.»

You should have learned about what eth haa Adam means in Genesis 1:27 which seems to me, that is what you perceive to be in error, but then again, you need to cross reference the books of the Bible.

John Cobb, Jr. in his book, A Christian Natural Theology, 1 makes this same error in his discussion of life after death as a part of a chapter on the human soul.

But there were some major flaws in the book, not only with some logical errors, but also with some misunderstandings of Scripture, and a misunderstanding of how and why the early church began to meet on Sunday rather than on Saturday as had been the custom among Jesus and His disciples.

But if, on the other hand, our theory should allow that a book may well be a revelation in spite of errors and passions and deliberate human composition, if only it be a true record of the inner experiences of great - souled persons wrestling with the crises of their fate, then the verdict would be much more favorable.

As I contend in a forthcoming book, Death on a Friday Afternoon, this falls far short of an encounter with the God of Israel who accepts defeat by our definition of the game in order to expose the error of our definition.

No other subject on the curriculum would be allowed to get away with this inexcusable error which insults children, not just since there is a basic mistake of mathematics, but because no actual verifiable figures are provided — anything will do in a book about RE.

... in the said book you try by means of various subterfuges to give the impression of leaving it [Copernicanism] undecided and labeled as probable; this is still a very serious error since there is no way an opinion declared and defined contrary to divine Scripture may be probable.

It is not possible to correct the countless errors in Berke's review of these two books in a letter, but one thing must be said: Holocaust revisionism would not have grown as it has over the last decade if not for the fact that our position can withstand the scrutiny of any fair - minded person.

The Quran and the Book of Mormon are riddled with error and in cases fasle according to arcaeology and anthropoligy.

However, since we don't have any autographs of Scripture, the hand of man is involved, and there is not a copy of any book in the Bible without errors, especially translations.

Since the Portuguese suspected the presence of errors in the books, they all became casualties in the auto - da - fe programme launched by the Portuguese padroado authorities at the close of the 16th century and later.

In the Bible book of Numbers, for instance, the writer Moses admits his own serious error for which he was severely reproved.

Later, in his book Radical Imperative: From Social Ethics to Theology, Bennett confessed his mistakes, and came to see that his view of American foreign policy in the 1940s and 1950s, a view that took American policies as manifestations and realizations of the kingdom of God, was gravely in error.