However, in this case (and others) a flurry of hastily prepared papers appeared,
claiming errors in our study, with our responses delayed months and longer.
The letter to Mann begins: Questions have been raised, according to a February 14, 2005, article in The Wall Street Journal, about the significance of methodological flaws and
data errors in your studies of the historical records of temperatures and climate change.
I am confident that there are no numerical calculations that are
in error in the studies supporting the Efficient Market Hypothesis.
«Isn't it plausible that many or most of the cancers attributed to
replication errors in this study involve genetic or environmental factors that are too ubiquitous to be identified as such?»
As of late there have been
numerous errors in studies conducted in medicine and psychiartry for instance, as reported over at Neurocritic, the magazine Science and various online science blogs.
However, in this case (and others) a flurry of hastily prepared papers appeared,
claiming errors in our study, with our responses delayed months and longer.
«Questions have been raised, according to a February 14, 2005, article in The Wall Street Journal, about the significance of methodological flaws and
data errors in your studies of the historical records of temperatures and climate change.»
The Motley Fool site administrators did not ban me because I discovered
the errors in the studies.
They banned me because so many of their community members hated me for discovering
the errors in the studies.
Look at what happened when I posted at Motley Fool about
the errors in the studies.
Many of the people who are going to suffer failed retirements do not want to know about
the errors in the studies.
So that's a public admission that you simply CAN NOT point out any such reference to bullying by Cut throat (or to death threats or to
errors in studies, etc) because these fantasies are all simply figments of a very sick imagination, residing inside a tortured mind, housed within the body of an out of work and rapidly deteriorating paunchy middle - aged troll.
The error in these studies are not hard to uncover.
Thousands of new retirees fall prey to
the errors in these studies every day.
The error in a study that gets the numerical calculations wrong can be easily identified and easily fixed.
But it takes some work to identify
the error in a study that is rooted in faulty logic.
The error in the studies is that they fail to include an adjustment for the valuations level that applies on the day the retirement begins.