This blog post details just one of many
errors of fact in the Weather Alert documentary identified and documented by Mr Fernley - Jones, which he has included in a series of formal submissions addressed to the ABC's Audience and Consumer Affairs.
A copy editor will also make sure you don't look like a fool by missing
errors of fact in your writing.
The Postdoctoral Scholar has the right to request
that errors of fact in personnel records be corrected, and to make additions to personnel records.
It's hard to believe that May would have made such
an error of fact in public, when he publicly demands that we «respect the facts `.
Although Shtaif broadly submitted the trial judge erred in finding him liable, he did not point to any palpable and overriding
error of fact in the trial judge's deceit findings.
Not exact matches
If your misstep was the result
of an
error in analysis or a failure to learn relevant
facts, then this is indeed the right course
of action.
No doubt many
of you sharp - eyed readers will have spotted a spelling
error, thinking I intended to refer to one
of these: But,
in fact, I really did have
in mind something more like this: We are following an example from the recently published Mathematica Beyond Mathematics by Jose Sanchez Leon, an up - to - date text that...
In fact some of the evidence you didn't mention which was popular fodder in the past has already been proven incorrect (horses in the americas before the spanish, and the BofM reference to elephants) Both considered ridiculous errors by Joseph Smith until elephants appeared on ancient Mayan / Incan temples and horses from the Brea tar pits were dated before the spanis
In fact some
of the evidence you didn't mention which was popular fodder
in the past has already been proven incorrect (horses in the americas before the spanish, and the BofM reference to elephants) Both considered ridiculous errors by Joseph Smith until elephants appeared on ancient Mayan / Incan temples and horses from the Brea tar pits were dated before the spanis
in the past has already been proven incorrect (horses
in the americas before the spanish, and the BofM reference to elephants) Both considered ridiculous errors by Joseph Smith until elephants appeared on ancient Mayan / Incan temples and horses from the Brea tar pits were dated before the spanis
in the americas before the spanish, and the BofM reference to elephants) Both considered ridiculous
errors by Joseph Smith until elephants appeared on ancient Mayan / Incan temples and horses from the Brea tar pits were dated before the spanish.
In fact, an error in the data later came to light and, once this had been corrected (published in an erratum in a later issue of the Journal), it became clear that there was actually no significant change in teenage pregnancy rate
In fact, an
error in the data later came to light and, once this had been corrected (published in an erratum in a later issue of the Journal), it became clear that there was actually no significant change in teenage pregnancy rate
in the data later came to light and, once this had been corrected (published
in an erratum in a later issue of the Journal), it became clear that there was actually no significant change in teenage pregnancy rate
in an erratum
in a later issue of the Journal), it became clear that there was actually no significant change in teenage pregnancy rate
in a later issue
of the Journal), it became clear that there was actually no significant change
in teenage pregnancy rate
in teenage pregnancy rates.
This is
in fact a resurgence
in other terms and with other objectives
in view —
of the
error always committed by Christians who intervene
in the sphere
of human actions to justify them and to testify that
in the end man has good reason for doing what he does.
The Syllabus
of Errors derives from one simple historical
fact:
In 1860, Pius IX lost his Italian dominions to the House
of Savoy, and the Papal States came to an end.
I shall argue that Whitehead did
in fact badly misinterpret Aristotle's concept
of substance, as Eslick claimed, and I shall suggest that, far from amounting to an inconsequential
error in historical exegesis, this misconception was a strong influence
in turning Whitehead's metaphysics
in the direction
of an epochal theory
of becoming.
Repeatedly he argued that the introduction
of women priests, the new prayer book and other changes
in the Episcopal Church had taken it out
of the mainstream
of Episcopalianism; that
in fact the schismatic group, by separating itself from all that «
error,» is the faithful remnant.
This is a desperate
error, or rather a desperate mistake, which overlooks (yes, and what is worse, it overlooks the
fact that what it overlooks is pretty nearly the best thing that can be said
of a man, since far worse often occurs)-- it overlooks the
fact that the majority
of men do never really manage
in their whole life to be more than they were
in childhood and youth, namely, immediacy with the addition
of a little dose
of self - reflection.
Ironically, this would mean that,
in fact, Whitehead is actually guilty
of the
error everyone associates with Bergson, while Bergson is a help to prevent the
error, and what Whitehead left undone regarding «the commensurability
of the two modes
of analysis,» Bergson may have accomplished
in creating a version
of the calculus neither committed to strictly quantitative nor strictly qualitative notions
of unity, a method to be used
in metaphysics.
Your statement betrays the
fact that your understanding
of the nature
of scripture (and corresponding sound hermeneutics) is
in error.
Facts, or evidence, seem incontrovertible only
in the light, or dark as the case may be,
of human judgment, which is the only source
of error on this planet.
Judging before obtaining all
facts invariably results
in error, especially when malicious organizations and people are interested
in having you embrace their position — just think
of all the zealots killing each other.
The
error arises from a wrong interpretation
of the obvious
fact that everybody wants to be a self, to have a sense
of the value
of his or her selfhood, and to realize, so far as may be, the potentialities given
in that selfhood.
In the minds of men and in the Church, a revealed truth can be compatible with an error in secular matters, as can be seen from the very fact that the Church declares contrary theories in theology to be equally «safe», that is to say, without danger to Revelatio
In the minds
of men and
in the Church, a revealed truth can be compatible with an error in secular matters, as can be seen from the very fact that the Church declares contrary theories in theology to be equally «safe», that is to say, without danger to Revelatio
in the Church, a revealed truth can be compatible with an
error in secular matters, as can be seen from the very fact that the Church declares contrary theories in theology to be equally «safe», that is to say, without danger to Revelatio
in secular matters, as can be seen from the very
fact that the Church declares contrary theories
in theology to be equally «safe», that is to say, without danger to Revelatio
in theology to be equally «safe», that is to say, without danger to Revelation.
In fact, this is perhaps the most anti-modern encyclical since the Syllabus
of Errors, Pius IX's haughty 1864 dismissal
of the conceits
of the modern era.
Skimpoles are incapable
of gratitude toward authority because they can conceive
of no
error they need to be protected from; like spoiled children — precisely,
in fact, like Damaged Young Men — they see all discipline as condemnatory and all condemnation as wicked.
In the words of Cardinal Pell in this issue, in the context of «the grave errors of this time», we need to ponder more deeply the fact that Christ is «the centre and fulfilment of what it means to be human»
In the words
of Cardinal Pell
in this issue, in the context of «the grave errors of this time», we need to ponder more deeply the fact that Christ is «the centre and fulfilment of what it means to be human»
in this issue,
in the context of «the grave errors of this time», we need to ponder more deeply the fact that Christ is «the centre and fulfilment of what it means to be human»
in the context
of «the grave
errors of this time», we need to ponder more deeply the
fact that Christ is «the centre and fulfilment
of what it means to be human».
It is only the pre-conceived heretical rejection
of the deity
of Christ that forces the Watchtower Society to inconsistently translate the Greek text, thus allowing their
error to gain some semblance
of legitimacy
in the minds
of those ignorant
of the
facts.
To give him credit, his theology sounded fairly orthodox at this point, with no sign
of the doctrinal
errors on the Trinity he's been accused
of (he's previously preached that there are actually nine parts to the Trinity, as each person
of the Godhead is
in fact a trinity itself).
It is not possible to correct the countless
errors in Berke's review
of these two books
in a letter, but one thing must be said: Holocaust revisionism would not have grown as it has over the last decade if not for the
fact that our position can withstand the scrutiny
of any fair - minded person.
In his first radio broadcast since his doomsday prediction failed to pan out in a spectacularly public fashion, the California preacher insisted his was an error of interpretation, not fac
In his first radio broadcast since his doomsday prediction failed to pan out
in a spectacularly public fashion, the California preacher insisted his was an error of interpretation, not fac
in a spectacularly public fashion, the California preacher insisted his was an
error of interpretation, not
fact.
As for the postliberal claim to eschew the experiential subjectivism
of liberal theology, Henry charged that
in elevating narrative over factuality, narrative theology becomes unable to distinguish truth from
error or
fact from fiction.
Unless
of course you believe
in a God call «Man» who you feel can never be
in error present
facts when you accuse religion
of being the most bloodiest wars.
To see it as a unified doctrine would
in fact be as much an
error as it would be to identify it with the teachings and ideas
of a single thinker.
Obviously we can not share
in these various Afro - Asiatic forms
of religion nor can we remain indifferent to the
fact that each
of them,
in its own way, should regard itself as being the equal
of any other and should authorize its followers not to seek to discover whether God has revealed the perfect and definitive form, free from all
error,
in which he wishes to be known, loved, and served.
Is it enough to give believe stats given the margin
of error and how did you verify they were
in fact atheists BEFORE said wreck?
Clearly then it is neither necessary nor possible to interpret the former aspects
of feelings as reducible to the latter under the present reading
of Hartshorne;
in fact, the converse
error is closer to the truth, since the latter is simply the former's active availability to the future.
This is partly so that Jesus can continue to identify with us
in our humanity, but also so that we are not deceived into thinking Jesus has already returned spiritually when
in fact He has not (this was part
of the
error Paul tried to correct
in the Thessalonian church).
The unspeakably tragic
error, he insisted, was to think that Christianity is a subcategory
of «religion,» when
in fact Christ explodes from within history all human constructions
of reality, religious or otherwise, thus illumining with the divine the world
of which we are part.
This
error remains intuitively plausible and has a decent cultural pedigree, so therefore those who make it should not be dismissed as utterly irrational or evil, even though they may seem so from the viewpoint
of one who bears
in mind the
facts of human development.
And the «vague» papal pronouncement that Mr. Lowell seems to doubt was ever made was,
in fact, a major — some think historic — allocution, delivered
in 1953 to an audience
of Italian jurists,
in which Pope Pius XII laid down the principle that «
in the interest
of a higher and broader good, it is justifiable not to impede
error by state laws and coercive measures.»
I would like to know more
of the
facts and motives involved before I decide whether the Church or the government is the one
in error.
Forgive me, therefore, for pulling you up on one small but rather critical
error of fact that occurred
in the first footnote to the...
Forgive me, therefore, for pulling you up on one small but rather critical
error of fact that occurred
in the first footnote to the article.
I know well whereof Peter Kreeft speaks, and
in fact have a rather guilty conscience about purveying some
of the
errors of the Received Wisdom myself from time to time until my further reading informed me how deceived I (and my hapless students) had been.
But shouldn't critics
of «the judicial usurpation
of politics» take at least some comfort
in the
fact that the
error was on the side
of democracy, as it were?
For those not familiar with academic debates, the impression could be given that West's work contains serious
errors, when,
in fact, his books have received imprimaturs and the endorsement
of trusted figures.
I LOVE when my cooking works out that way!There might seem like more ingredients for this type
of bread than traditional yeast breads, but
in fact it comes together much more quickly with little chance
of error.
The
fact Wilshere was played as a AM and Rambo as CM is what I would call a tactical
error, the style
of players they are, they was put
in the wrong way around and it exposed their weaknesses.
Joel Campbell is good but arsenal fans never cease to amaze me.They never make up their mind they wait for the player to have a dip
in form and then insult and criticize him and say childish things.Then when he does well they pretend like they were always
in support
of him.I remember always saying here first that Szczesny is a better goalkeeper than Ospina.I also proudly defended Szczesny everytime they aimed at him.How i wish he started at Chelsea or any other team and i bet you he would not be this
error prone.I know forever he will always be better than Ospina and that is a
fact not even an opinion.For Campbell vs Ox its there for everyone to see Ox would eventually win the battle come one day.But injuries have made him so unlucky.He should go to Chelsea where he would be better taken care
of and would make people eat their words.
The
fact that their equalising goal late
in the second half came as a direct result
of an attacking Arsenal move that we messed up with an awful attempt at a cross by Monreal, with some second rate defending and what looks like an
error from the keeper Petr Cech along the way, is just about typical
of the way things have been going for the Gunners this year.
«Given the unusual combination
of facts — as well as the
fact that nothing
in the existing Rules or Decisions specifically addressed such circumstances
of simultaneous competitor
error and Committee
error — the Committee reasonably exercised its discretion under Rule 33 - 7 to waive the penalty
of disqualification under Rule 6 - 6d, while still penalizing Woods two strokes under Rules 26 - 1a and 20 - 7c for playing from a wrong place.»
Of course they're going to resist change, and pretend, as an organization, that the process is essentially perfect, and in fact could be improved only by a) fewer grenades thrown by impudent non - members / non-voters like me, and b) the dissolution of the Veterans Committee, which after all was invented largely to redress any (supposed) errors made by the BBWA
Of course they're going to resist change, and pretend, as an organization, that the process is essentially perfect, and
in fact could be improved only by a) fewer grenades thrown by impudent non - members / non-voters like me, and b) the dissolution
of the Veterans Committee, which after all was invented largely to redress any (supposed) errors made by the BBWA
of the Veterans Committee, which after all was invented largely to redress any (supposed)
errors made by the BBWAA.
Gabriel however didn't maintain his place
in the side, largely due to a bit
of recklessness on the pitch, as well as the
fact communication
errors were made as he didn't speak very good English.