[17] The Teachers» Federation asserts that the judgment is the product of (i) fundamental
errors of law regarding interpretation and application of the duty of fair representation, and (ii) a multiplicity of factual errors involving findings not based on the evidence and contrary to the evidence, which are palpable in nature and overriding in effect... [more]
[17] The Teachers» Federation asserts that the judgment is the product of (i) fundamental
errors of law regarding interpretation and application of the duty of fair representation, and (ii) a multiplicity of factual errors involving findings not based on the evidence and contrary to the evidence, which are palpable in nature and overriding in effect.
Not exact matches
«In their
regard, we must point out that our client does not take over responsibility for correctly filling out nomination papers
of candidates only because the
law requires the returning officers to draw their attention to statutorily non complaint
errors.»
«With
regard to the non-complaint
errors in respect
of which our client expressed its inability to accept your client's nomination papers however, we have been instructed by our client that it was impossible to comply with strict time period specified by rules within which your clients are by
law permitted to amend or alter their nomination papers to comply with the requirements
of the
law regulating same, especially that your clients presented their nomination papers a day to the expiry
of the nomination period, although your clients and all candidates were urged to submit their nomination papers as early as possible
Under no circumstances will the sites or the Chopra parties be liable to you for any loss or damages
of any kind that are directly or indirectly related to the sites, the materials in the sites, the downloadable items, user content, your use or inability to use, or the performance
of the sites, any action taken in connection with an investigation by the sites or
law enforcement authorities
regarding your use
of the sites, and action taken in connection with copyright or other intellectual property owners, any
errors or omission in the sites, technical operation, or any damage to any users computer, hardware, software, wireless devices, cellular phone, modem or other equipment or technology, including without limitation damage from any security breach or from any virus, bugs, tampering, fraud, scam,
error, omission, interruption, defect, delay in operation or transmission, computer line or network failure or any other technical or other malfunction, even if foreseeable or even if the sites or Chopra parties have been advised
of or should have known
of the possibility
of such damages, whether in an action
of contract, negligence, strict liability or tort.
Sole custody orders issued by an Arizona judge may be appealed to the Arizona Court
of Appeals, which will review the case to determine if there were apparent
errors in interpreting the
law in
regards to the situation at hand or a trial judge's abuse
of his or her discretion.
None
of Air Canada's alleged Agency
errors of fact — inexplicably mischaracterized as
errors of law — are perverse or capricious, made without
regard to the evidence, or demonstrably unreasonable.
Although the statute
of limitations
regarding medical malpractice does state that no medical malpractice suit can be brought after five years has passed from the initial act or
error made by the doctor in question, Kentucky courts have made it clear that this «five - year rule» is unconstitutional and should no longer be considered as part
of the
law.
In addition, the depiction
of the standard
of review dispute as simply one
of choosing between «a mixed fact and
law exercise» or «an extricable legal
error», without
regard for the nature
of the decision - maker, was explicitly rejected by the Court in Intact.
-- It is
error to
regard a random sample from a population as highly representative
of the total population (part
of the
law of large numbers);