No - one and no evidence imaginable could possibly persuade a closed - minded zealot, such as Durianrider, of their gross
errors of logic and evidence and their willful intellectual dishonesty.
Confusing correlations with causations represents one of the most common human
errors of logic.
Given to
errors of logic and unwilling to go all the way past the «god did it» or «god must have done it»..
How do you not see
the error of your logic?
If this is what the UN did, then it's not the Precautionary Principle; reasoning from the conclusion to the premise is always
an error of Logic, and the PP is a tool of Logic.
> [R] easoning from the conclusion to the premise is always
an error of Logic, and the PP is a tool of Logic.
Not exact matches
It simply applies rational methods in taking and analyzing data, following certain rules to assure that data are as free from
error as possible, and checking the
logic of our models to make sure they are self - consistent.
By a strange quirk
of logic we have, therefore, come to repeat the
errors we chastised the liberals and Roman Catholics for committing.
And in doing so it leads to a serious
error in
logic: after abstracting so completely from the experiential quality that pervades all
of nature it sets forth the desiccated end - product
of its abstracting as though it were reality - itself and everything else a mere coloring by human sensory projection.
Categorization
of people is a
logic error.
To make such a leap
of logic is to commit the other glaring
error often made by proponents
of animal rights and environmental ethics: they fail to see that the rights endowed to animals are not identical with the rights
of human beings.
Whitehead turns out to be right: the presumed «exactness»
of logic is a fake, and Russell was no more or less prone to
error or excess through employing it than were other philosophers (like Whitehead) who eschewed it — a point Russell seems later to concede in his account
of his subsequent «Retreat from Pythagoras» (BR, p. 54).
Let's see — I'm guessing by the spelling
errors and lack
of logic that you are a home - schooled Christian — am I right?
According to Stossel, Gilbert contends that «because
of logic - processing
errors our brains tend to make, we don't want the things that would make us happy and the things that we want (more money, say, or a bigger house or a fancier car) won't make us happy.»
In any case it would be a fundamental
error to contend that the premises are principles
of logic.
«If there are
errors, help kids self - correct by asking them to explain their
logic or to show you what source
of information they used,» says educational psychologist Jennifer Little, PhD, creator
of Parents Teach Kids (www.parentsteachkids.com), a collection
of modules that show parents how to teach foundational learning skills at home.
While I agree with what you wrote to this point, had to stop here because
of such a fundamental
logic error.
Perry admits Clooney is clearly passionate and knowledgeable about South Sudan (they've met), but finds
error in the
logic of such populist philanthropy.
Since Mr. Brundige cited statistics in his report to the town board it would be silly not to conclude this letter with statistics based purely on
logic: Since the
error of machine - collected data at the airport versus actual human data collection is 10 times what Mr. Brundige reported for a specific period
of time, then the town board must correct all data in Mr. Brundige's report by multiplying the figures by 10.
ACEP's contention that Ghana does not need the second KARPOWER barge, is is not only wrong in
logic, we see it as a well calculated
error committed by the energy think - tank to inject a message
of hopelessness and apprehension among the Ghanaian populace, as far as electricity distribution is concerned.
Thank you for pointing out the
errors in
logic of her argument.
The production values and writing are gawdawful and amateurish, with lots
of spelling
errors, bad
logic, really bad directing, plot design, game design.
While the original is something
of a pedant's paradise, filled with continuity
errors, leaps
of logic and one grating reference to UNIX, it is still a hugely effective ride from a master movie maker.
Pan is a collection
of neat yet unorganized ideas (plus some obvious continuity
errors) and great visuals, but not a whole lot
of narrative
logic.
The advantages
of visual programming are: students don't need to learn syntax and can not create syntax
errors; students can see what blocks (instructions) are available; and, blocks often hide complex
logic or operations in a single block.
The teacher who hopes to get students generating hypotheses will first need to cover and identify
logic and faulty
logic,
errors of attack, weak reference misinformation, media influence, and statistical limitations.
Teacher candidates may be surprised to realize that patterns
of error in English can be explained (and perhaps more effectively addressed) by understanding the
logic of the student's native language and some
of their cultural experiences, as well as the frustrations an ELL student might be facing.
Seeing how the grammatical
errors made by these particular students are often rooted in the
logic of their native languages and how a teacher who understands something about that
logic and that culture can sensitively respond in context - specific ways may lead teacher candidates to develop cognitive flexibility as they wonder what other patterns in student writing (and their own) are the result
of where they grew up and how they can take that into account when writing feedback.
As the writer
of your dissertation, you may remain blind to internal
errors in formatting, organization, or
logic of expressions and conclusions.
Eventually, through trial and
error,
logic and commonsense, I realized the markets were best traded by just analyzing the naked price action
of the charts that had been staring me in the face the whole time.
-- Still some moments when
logic goes out the window in favor
of trial and
error.
Claiming the opposite is blatant
error of reasoning and
logic.
Anyone making this sort
of argument would be hugely motivated to demonstrate such an
error,
logic be damned.
A very effective method to solve holistic physical problems, is to summarize all
of the observations / paradoxes / anomalies related to the subject in question and then use the
logic of the observations / analysis / paradoxes / anomalies to appropriately adjust / modify existing mechanisms, to develop new mechanisms, and to correct fundamental
errors in theory.
I think the implication that the use
of the TAR forcing changes the confidence level is an
error in
logic.
Further, while you assume that because I find you and a few others irrational or dishonest, I find most to be so appears to be an elementary
logic error of applying the individual to the general.
I don't mean the headline grabbing comments (although some
of those are worthy
of a Mr Spock Eyebrow moment), I mean
errors in the
logic of the code itself.
This is where your
errors in reasoning eventually lead you to your epic failure
of logic.
In your case the
error is in the way you link the rules
of logic to the physical science.
... Gerhard Gerlich and Ralf D. Tscheuschner claim to have falsified the existence
of an atmospheric greenhouse effect.1 Here, we show that their methods,
logic, and conclusions are in
error.
It's sort
of a catch 22 when you design code whose purpose is to find out if anomalies will occur in that your code needs to be free to create anomalies which could just as easily be coding /
logic errors.
Now, in your latest reponse (at August 13, 2010 at 8:18 pm) you accuse me
of using poor
logic when I say that you have not yet stated any clear statement
of an
error by Monckton!
River
logic can be used to build a case against an opponent, to ferret out the logical
errors in new statutes, or to automate the interpretation
of a particularly complex statute.
In a note about the security update, the company explained that «A
logic error existed in the validation
of credentials.
These include: attention to detail (in carefully carrying out routine tests), foresight and
logic (since you anticipate problems before they happen), and self - motivation (as you take initiative to reduce the risk
of errors or accidents).
This was typically followed by a test
of basic
logic and computing skills (eg write an algorithm to sort an array), and problem solving (eg finding
errors in a program).
Assigned responsibilities
of testing
logic errors and logging defects in the software development process
Ability to troubleshoot Determining causes
of operating
errors and deciding what to do about it * Repairing - Repairing machines or systems using the needed tools * Critical Thinking - Using
logic...
Sample resumes for this position include such tasks as developing customized solutions to improve the productivity and capabilities
of GIS analysis teams, translating business
logic into functioning programs that efficiently and reliably turn inputs into outputs necessary for critical organization functions, and producing automated solutions for time - consuming and
error - prone tasks ranging from the mass production
of mapping products to spatial data management.