As he is both the hidden and the revealed Son of Man, so likewise
the eschatological significance of Galilee is both hidden and revealed.
The eschatological significance of the phrase «son of man» in such passages can not be denied, but many deny the authenticity of the passages themselves.
The story takes on
its eschatological significance.
The connection between them is not that the resurrection is a miraculous proof of the cosmic,
eschatological significance of the cross.
The whole was conceived as a continuous, divinely directed process, in which past, present, and future alike had
eschatological significance.
What I am concerned with is the «historic» significance of the unique event of past history, in virtue of which it possesses
eschatological significance although it is a unique event of past history.
And this is exactly what gives the event of Christ
its eschatological significance.
Karl Barth draws a similar conclusion, linking the meaning of the holy day to «salvation history and
its eschatological significance.»
We have now to turn once more to the primitive kerygma, with special attention to that part of it which attributed
an eschatological significance to facts of the present.
But if that be so, the resurrection can not be a miraculous proof capable of demonstration and sufficient to convince the skeptic that the cross really has the cosmic and
eschatological significance ascribed to it.
So the word might not have
eschatological significance here.
Not exact matches
Deeply indebted to the work of Albert Schweitzer from the turn of the twentieth century, he has cogently argued time and again for the historicity of the
eschatological preaching of Jesus and the
significance of the Passion.
In other words, the cross is not just an event of the past which can be contemplated, but is the
eschatological event in and beyond time, in so far as it (understood in its
significance, that is, for faith) is an ever - present reality.
The
significance of this initial reaction has been powerfully described by theologian James Alison in his book, Raising Abel: The Recovery of the
Eschatological Imagination.
Levering argues in effect that the «
eschatological fulfillment» in Christ means that the Old Testament distinction between Israel and the nations no longer has any theological or spiritual
significance.
The Pauline kerygma, therefore, is a proclamation of the facts of the death and resurrection of Christ in an
eschatological setting which gives
significance to the facts.
It is clear, then, that we have here, as in the preaching which we found to lie behind the Pauline epistles, a proclamation of the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ, in an
eschatological setting from which those facts derive their saving
significance.
The Christological question, which was originally a question about the
eschatological and soteriological
significance of an event, has become a question about the metaphysical nature of a person.
As always, exegetes obsessed by Jewish custom or
eschatological expectation or charismatic gifts or psychological states may miss the highly political
significance of what the Gospel writer is recording.
Their knowledge of the life and ministry of Jesus, their experience of him as risen from the dead, and their recognition in him as 1) that hoped - for
eschatological prophet (the Christ), as 2) God's own envoy, who could and does bear God's name (the Lord), and as 3) one who did and does God's saving work (the Savior)-- all contribute to the
significance of that sign received first by the shepherds.
Just this is what we found to be the final
significance of the
eschatological message, that man now stands under the necessity of decision, that his «Now» is always for him the last hour, in which his decision against the world and for God is demanded, in which every claim of his own is to be silenced.
The closed world view of modern science, both in physics and in psychology, leaves no room for a unique historical event with an
eschatological — i.e. final and absolute —
significance.
But does not that event of the past possess
eschatological and redemptive
significance in its own right?
The
eschatological expectation of the Christian church looks forward to a time when the meaning and
significance of every human life will be revealed in Christ.