Not exact matches
In other words, the cross is not just an
event of the past which can be contemplated, but is the
eschatological event in and beyond time, in so far as it (understood in its
significance, that is, for faith) is an ever - present reality.
And this is exactly what gives the
event of Christ its
eschatological significance.
What I am concerned with is the «historic»
significance of the unique
event of past history, in virtue
of which it possesses
eschatological significance although it is a unique
event of past history.
The Christological question, which was originally a question about the
eschatological and soteriological
significance of an
event, has become a question about the metaphysical nature
of a person.
The closed world view
of modern science, both in physics and in psychology, leaves no room for a unique historical
event with an
eschatological — i.e. final and absolute —
significance.
But does not that
event of the past possess
eschatological and redemptive
significance in its own right?