Not exact matches
Our public comments highlight specific provisions in ESSA for which New Leaders thinks that departmental regulations or guidance (including regulations or guidance specifically on the role of school leaders) will be needed if the new
law is to deliver on its promise to strengthen teaching,
especially in the highest - need schools, and accelerate
academic achievement and other outcomes, particularly for our most vulnerable students.
And I suppose some
law professors (and those occasionally masquerading as
academic lawyers) might be heard to complain,
especially if it gets them into print.
Law school, especially the first year, is academic intensive, which leads students to completely ignore other important aspects of law school — like acquiring practical experience and networki
Law school,
especially the first year, is
academic intensive, which leads students to completely ignore other important aspects of
law school — like acquiring practical experience and networki
law school — like acquiring practical experience and networking.
While there will always be opportunities for pure legal theorists,
especially at the most elite and established
law faculties, there is an increasing willingness among the academic community to not only train their students on the use of technology in the classroom, but also participate directly in the development of this technology, often in an interdisciplinary relationship with other faculties (for example, the work we're doing with Duke La
law faculties, there is an increasing willingness among the
academic community to not only train their students on the use of technology in the classroom, but also participate directly in the development of this technology, often in an interdisciplinary relationship with other faculties (for example, the work we're doing with Duke
LawLaw).
As usual, legal
academics seem oblivious to the fact that BigLaw (
especially, the specialties mentioned) has nothing to do with the practice of
law in the United States for the vast majority of lawyers, and is thus a bogus reference group for the vast majority of
law students.
In Friday's
Law Librarian Conversations podcast (formerly the Law Librarian podcast) we talked about the up - take of this week by academic law libraries, especially considering that the focus tends to be on public librari
Law Librarian Conversations podcast (formerly the
Law Librarian podcast) we talked about the up - take of this week by academic law libraries, especially considering that the focus tends to be on public librari
Law Librarian podcast) we talked about the up - take of this week by
academic law libraries, especially considering that the focus tends to be on public librari
law libraries,
especially considering that the focus tends to be on public libraries.
I think it would be
especially useful for
academic librarians to have insight into the way in which lawyers use firm libraries, and the kind of information they seek — useful in that we would be better able to equip our students (who will be those lawyers) while in
law school.
This is
especially so in
academic law libraries, where we are losing or have already lost our connection to the «technical» aspects of our profession and are unfamiliar with resources outside of
law.