One of the biggest challenges facing Common Core supporters —
especially conservative reformers who helped develop the standards in the first place — lies in the opposition from movement conservatives who should be the first to embrace providing all children with strong, college - preparatory curricula.
Reformers,
especially conservative reformers, should raise their voices and loudly call out Trump for appointing Bannon and demand the latter's removal.
Not exact matches
But there are still
reformers,
especially those in the
conservative and school choice wings, as well as some centrist Democrat players, who remain silent in the face of what is happening.
While Coates doesn't touch on education policy, he essentially makes a strong historical case for why
reformers (
especially increasingly erstwhile
conservatives in the movement) must go back to embracing accountability measures and a strong federal role in education policymaking that, along with other changes in American society, are key to helping children from poor and minority households (as well as their families and communities) attain economic and social equality.
Centrist and progressive Democrat
reformers have already spent the past two decades dealing with challenges to their thinking and efforts from both traditionalists within their ideological circles and from
conservative reform allies,
especially on matters such as school choice.
And some —
especially conservative —
reformers feel alienated.
Such a point also shines light on the fact that EdTrust and other centrist Democrat
reformers backing the plan have been silent about the Obama administration's sloppy and shoddy process for granting waivers,
especially as President Barack Obama struggles to keep office; it is hard for waiver gambit supporters to complain about Florida's implementation of one of the alternatives to AYP they support without pointing out how the Obama administration's own mishandling of the effort allowed for such antics in the first place (or giving movement
conservatives more reasons to oppose a strong federal role in reforming American public education).
More - importantly, the movement must address its own divides,
especially between centrist Democrat, civil rights - oriented, and
conservative reformers who disagree over such basic fundamentals as whether the achievement gaps that trap half of our children into poverty and prison should be addressed in policy and practice.