The
essay by the distinguished jurist and
constitutional scholar Robert H. Bork
on «lawless
law» was an important part of that symposium, and he returns to that subject in a comprehensive and devastating article in the New Criterion, titled «Adversary Jurisprudence.»
Making his pitch in the UK
Constitutional Law Blog, he lamented that the wikipedia article on the UK constitution, first port of call for many a lay person (and law student in a hurry), «would not pass a peer review process for an academic journal and nor would it receive a good mark as an undergraduate essay (though I suspect it has been cut and pasted into some over the years)&raqu
Law Blog, he lamented that the wikipedia article
on the UK constitution, first port of call for many a lay person (and
law student in a hurry), «would not pass a peer review process for an academic journal and nor would it receive a good mark as an undergraduate essay (though I suspect it has been cut and pasted into some over the years)&raqu
law student in a hurry), «would not pass a peer review process for an academic journal and nor would it receive a good mark as an undergraduate
essay (though I suspect it has been cut and pasted into some over the years)».