Sentences with phrase «essay questions in»

We excluded essay scores from our analysis because we found that some professors tended to grade essay questions in a manner that ensured students on the margin received a passing score on the exam.

Keep your essay question in mind: Always keep the essay prompt near when you are reading and writing.

Custom written research papers are interesting to read, gain attention of the reader from the first line, answer an essay question in detail, present evidence of thorough analysis, and engage the reader into thinking over the raised theme.

Not exact matches

Questrom is looking for a mix of the typical admission metrics: a strong undergraduate GPA, solid work experience, a track record of achievement, leadership ability, a good GMAT or GRE score, favorable recommendations, smart answers to both the written and video essay questions, and professional poise and presence in an in - person interview.

How much risk drivers will bear, and what rewards they will enjoy, are very much open questions,» Brishen Rogers, Associate Professor of Law at Temple University, said in a June essay.

In fact, I struggled very hard and would even get anxiety to write essays and written response questions.

And here's a former Facebook data protection executive, questioning Facebook's ability to self regulate in a damning essay currently going viral over at the New York Times:

Justin Trudeau's surprising confession in a 2001 Globe and Mail essay («Something I'm Passionate About», Feb. 3) raises three questions: 1) Â does he read newspapers and watch the news now?

Finally, if the point of this author's essay is to conclude that we shouldn't waste our time on whether Judas is in heaven or hell, why bring it up in the first place with a headline that begs the question?

It's true as our Peter once said, in one of the most engaging essays on the man out there, that «On the most fundamental questions, Jefferson ought not to be our only guide.»

In fact, the question of living life without any evident inherent meaning is the core of Albert Camus's great essay, «The Myth of Sissyphus.»

Barr's essay addresses at some length the question of design in biology, but does not clearly affirm that reason can grasp the reality of design without the aid of faith.

A Christian writer then responds to the previous essays by answering the questions, «Do I recognize my Christianity in what has been written?»

When discussing the question of equality, he quips in his essay «The Spiritual Roots of Capitalism and Socialism»: «Here, I will simply plead my Jewishness and say, equality has never been a Jewish thing.

The aim of this essay is to raise some questions concerning the relation between logic and metaphysics in the philosophies of Hegel and Whitehead.

The question is whether the pluralism of methods of interpretation in these essays claiming to exhibit a process perspective is in fact rooted in such a theory.

For one, they fail to understand the reframing of the question as one of defense, which is what I called in my essay the subordination of the grammar of desert to that of the common good.

But my basic convictions about them were derived not from these philosophers but partly from my being surrounded from birth with the reality in question; partly from Emerson's essays and the works of James and Royce; partly from the poems of Shelley and Wordsworth (which similarly influenced Whitehead); and most of all from my own experience, reflected upon especially during my two years in the army medical corps, when I had considerable leisure to think about life and death and other fundamental questions.

18 The second part of this essay is explicitly directed toward answering «the question of the sense, if any, in which one can still say with the historic Christian community that the event of Jesus Christ is the decisive act of God.

In this collection of essays he addresses questions as various as marriage and divorce, immigration policy, and the importance of national holidays.

Questions surrounding the blueprint of human existence and the fundamental question of who man is have been much on my mind in recent months because of several essays on homosexuality published in First Things by Wesley Hill and Joshua Gonnerman.

In one of the essays in this volume, pastoral theologian Carrie Doehring distinguishes between «theological literacy,» which knows the vocabulary and the right answers to the questions, and «theological fluency,» in which «we «inhabit» our theology as a faith perspective that we use to understand and respond to spiritual and psychological needIn one of the essays in this volume, pastoral theologian Carrie Doehring distinguishes between «theological literacy,» which knows the vocabulary and the right answers to the questions, and «theological fluency,» in which «we «inhabit» our theology as a faith perspective that we use to understand and respond to spiritual and psychological needin this volume, pastoral theologian Carrie Doehring distinguishes between «theological literacy,» which knows the vocabulary and the right answers to the questions, and «theological fluency,» in which «we «inhabit» our theology as a faith perspective that we use to understand and respond to spiritual and psychological needin which «we «inhabit» our theology as a faith perspective that we use to understand and respond to spiritual and psychological needs.

But theologically and ecclesiastically, on one level, of course, it was a humanitarian issue the one Bonhoeffer had raised in his 1933 essay on the church and the Jewish question: What was the mission of Christianity in an ideological society?

theology's purpose is to give a «rational account of the truth of faith,» as Pannenberg stated in his essay «Faith and Reason» (Basic Questions in Theology, Volume 11 [Fortress, 197 11, pp. 52 - 53).

It is the doctrine of the Church» and with it questions of ministry, sacramentality, and liturgy» that the essays in this short volume address.

If we know in advance that we could not and will not commit crimes against humanity, the question posed by this essay has already been answered and we could stop right here.

The distinction between these two questions may help us explain the difference between Collingwood's approach towards metaphysics in the manuscripts on metaphysics before 1936, on the one hand, and in An Essay on Metaphysics and the manuscripts on metaphysics after 1936, on the other.

To ask this question is to ask for a reason, and Whitehead has a basic principle, termed the ontological principle, which asserts that «actual entities are the only reasons» (Process and Reality, An Essay in Cosmology 37).

The philosophy of organism culminates in a new metaphysical theology.12 In Whitehead's view, «The most general formulation of the religious problem is the question whether the process of the temporal world passes into the formation of other actualities, bound together in an order in which novelty does not mean loss» (Process and Reality, An Essay in Cosmology 517)-- as it does in the temporal worlin a new metaphysical theology.12 In Whitehead's view, «The most general formulation of the religious problem is the question whether the process of the temporal world passes into the formation of other actualities, bound together in an order in which novelty does not mean loss» (Process and Reality, An Essay in Cosmology 517)-- as it does in the temporal worlIn Whitehead's view, «The most general formulation of the religious problem is the question whether the process of the temporal world passes into the formation of other actualities, bound together in an order in which novelty does not mean loss» (Process and Reality, An Essay in Cosmology 517)-- as it does in the temporal worlin an order in which novelty does not mean loss» (Process and Reality, An Essay in Cosmology 517)-- as it does in the temporal worlin which novelty does not mean loss» (Process and Reality, An Essay in Cosmology 517)-- as it does in the temporal worlin Cosmology 517)-- as it does in the temporal worlin the temporal world.

This question is a large one and can not be handled adequately in this essay.

Krister Stendahl gave voice to this in his important essay The Bible and the Role of Women: A Case Study in Hermeneutics written in 1958.6 Donald Dayton expressed a similar position in his article in the Post American: «the real question - at least for most Christians [is]: Which of these views (the hierarchical or the egalitarian — or perhaps a synthesis of the two) has the clearer grounding in scripture?

Some indication of my views on these questions can be found in my essays on «The Finality of Christ in a Whiteheadian Perspective» (This was prepared as a lecture for the Third Oxford Institute on Methodist Theological Studies held in July, 1965.

In 1934, disagreements between them came to focus in public debate, (The essays in question are Brunner's «Nature and Grace» and Barth's «No!&raquIn 1934, disagreements between them came to focus in public debate, (The essays in question are Brunner's «Nature and Grace» and Barth's «No!&raquin public debate, (The essays in question are Brunner's «Nature and Grace» and Barth's «No!&raquin question are Brunner's «Nature and Grace» and Barth's «No!»

In this video essay Burnett discusses her own experiences in the Middle East and speaks to an awarding - winning journalist, Deborah Scroggins, the author of «Wanted Women: Faith, Lies & The War on Terror,» to try and answer the question «Islamic or Islamist?&raquIn this video essay Burnett discusses her own experiences in the Middle East and speaks to an awarding - winning journalist, Deborah Scroggins, the author of «Wanted Women: Faith, Lies & The War on Terror,» to try and answer the question «Islamic or Islamist?&raquin the Middle East and speaks to an awarding - winning journalist, Deborah Scroggins, the author of «Wanted Women: Faith, Lies & The War on Terror,» to try and answer the question «Islamic or Islamist?»

4Cobb has proposed a solution in terms of the occasion's past world, which I question in my essay, «God at Work: The Way God is Effective in a Process Perspective,» Encounter 57 (1996), 327 - 340, at 332f.

In the Introduction to her Love» s Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature (1990), Nussbaum relates that when she was in high school and college, she wrote papers about literary works that explored questions that she would later learn to call «philosophical» questionIn the Introduction to her Love» s Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature (1990), Nussbaum relates that when she was in high school and college, she wrote papers about literary works that explored questions that she would later learn to call «philosophical» questionin high school and college, she wrote papers about literary works that explored questions that she would later learn to call «philosophical» questions.

The essay clearly draws the battle lines: the ambitious, narrow, worldly scholars who refuse to address the large human questions and seek only fame in the modern academy versus the religiously faithful who stand by the eternal principles even at the expense of their careers.

An official doctrine of the Church does not lose its binding authority only because some theologian expresses — whether in a book, an essay, a lecture, on the radio or in television — an opinion of which another Catholic can not understand how it is compatible with the doctrine of the Church; and mostly the theologian in question will not have tried very hard to show how it can agree with it.

In the first paragraph of the first essay of The Federalist Papers, Alexander Hamilton introduced the basic theme: «It seems to have been reserved to the people of this country, by their conduct and example, to decide the important question, whether societies of men are really capable or not of establishing good government from reflection and choice, or whether they are forever destined to depend for their political constitutions on accident and force.»

That is the question posed in this essay.

He did revise an essay that Walter Cardinal Kasper liked to cite in support of Kasper's preferred resolution of the question.

John O'Sullivan discusses this intelligently in «Mistaken Identities,» an essay appearing in the New Criterion some while back: «To the old question, Is there a ghost in the machine?

A particularly effective presentation of the criterion of dissimilarity is that by Ernst Käsemann in the essay which sparked the intensive discussion of the question of the historical Jesus which has been such a prominent feature of recent New Testament scholarship, «Das Problem des historischen Jesus».44.

It is true, as Francis Miller points out in his essay, that the church will probably survive in some form in any circumstances, and that the real question is whether it will survive as a reliable witness to the Christian faith.

Berlin comes closest to addressing this question in an essay titled, «Alleged Relativism in Eighteenth - Century European Thought.»

The first question was aimed at the fact that after A.D. 100 the churches (In this essay, the word «church» is capitalized when it refers to the entire Christian community.

By responding to my colleague's review of our work, I wish to clarify further what «process hermeneutics is or intends to be, a question arising from Kelsey's review essay in part, at least, because of the «hermeneutical pluralism» represented in the collection of essays published under this banner.1

At any rate, if process - relational thinkers can work through fundamental systemic problems relating to the nature of the self and the God - world relationship, perhaps we might solve as a by - product the question of a realistic envisioning of the resurrection life; if we can't, then this mode of thought has problems more foundational than those at issue in this essay.

In the following essay, which appears in our April print issue, National Association of Evangelicals president Leith Anderson and LifeWay Research executive director Ed Stetzer have devised a timely way to answer these questionIn the following essay, which appears in our April print issue, National Association of Evangelicals president Leith Anderson and LifeWay Research executive director Ed Stetzer have devised a timely way to answer these questionin our April print issue, National Association of Evangelicals president Leith Anderson and LifeWay Research executive director Ed Stetzer have devised a timely way to answer these questions.

But in her newest collection, Critics, Monsters, Fanatics, and Other Literary Essays, a unifying question emerges with urgency from these familiar subjects.