Sentences with phrase «essence of actuality»

The essence of all actuality, according to Hartshorne, is to be non-exhaustive of potency, and this potency is the result of the infinite range of possibility that the PN of God offers.

Not exact matches

The Whiteheadian actuality, the occasion, represents a complete and thoroughgoing rejection of the substance - attribute conception, and is entirely relational in its essence.

First of all, it is as true for Aristotle as it is for Whitehead that in dealing with natural actuality we always encounter both principles or «poles,» which together constitute one natural entity, whose duality or bipolarity is part of its essence.

Whitehead believes that Plato discovered those general ideas which are relevant to everything that happens: The Ideas, the Physical Elements, The Psyche, The Eros, The Harmony, The Mathematical Relations, The Receptacle.30 In adapting Plato's seven basic notions Whitehead takes «the notion of actuality as in its essence process «31 as his starting point.

It contributes its unique individual essence to the determination of the actuality.

For Husserl every actuality (Whitehead's actual Occasion) is an expression of an essence (Whitehead's eternal object); experience is composed of «individual instances of... essences» (Ideas 113).

Elsewhere the same idea is expressed in different terms by White - head: «the very essence of real actuality — that is, of the completely real — is process.

The first category states the doctrine in a general way: that every ultimate actuality embodies in its own essence, what Alexander terms «a principle of unrest,» namely, its becoming.

This «inclusiveness» is of the essence of the dialogical relation, for the teacher sees the position of the other in his concrete actuality yet does not lose sight of his own.

Everything that is actual participates in the same kind of existence, what might be called the essence or nature of actuality.

He draws a three-fold distinction among essence (the most abstract feature of what a thing is), existence (the fact that a thing is), and actuality (the particular characteristics that qualify an existing thing).

Moreover, in the divine case, essence (what God is) and existence (that God is) are the same.12 Thus, Hartshorne usually speaks of the distinction between existence and actuality.

The «consequent» actuality of deity is the sequence of determinate, contingent experiences expressing both the essence of deity and the de facto content of the world God experiences at a given moment.

If X5S1 is to display itself in its for - otherness aspect, the process of gaining actuality will bring into play the second set of characteristics: non-unique relational essence (3), element of associated hierarchy (5), rendering of possibility of decision (6), ingression (8), and repeatability (9).

If possibility and actuality could be united to become necessity, they would become an absolutely different essence, which is not a kind of change; and in becoming necessity or the necessary, they would become that which alone of all things excludes coming into existence, which is just as impossible as it is self - contradictory.

Given his dipolar theism, Hartshorne must also be interpreted in this passage as affirming not that the «eternal abstractor» has an immutable vision of the categories in every actuality but that each divine feeling recognizes anew that it bears a categorial essence which will also have been borne by all other divine feelings.

Possibility and actuality do not differ in essence but in being; how could there from this difference be formed a synthesis constituting necessity, which is not a determination of being but a determination of essence, since it is the essence of the necessary to be.

The existence of an «essence» or «coherent idea» involves that this latter is «somehow actualized or instantiated,» the actuality of an essence involving the «how or in what concrete form, if at all» it is actualized.

This way of relating one actual entity to another actual entity is the essence of each entity's relationship to every other actuality.