That's why in my original post I stated that I have a «concern» about the «troubling» Ramirez ruling because the «panel seems to
essentially abdicate its responsibility to assess the substantive reasonableness of a stat - max sentence when the defendant had viable arguments that his sentence was far greater than necessary in light of all the 3553 (a) consideration.»
«I say «most» because I have met people who
essentially abdicate all decision - making to their advisor,» says DeGoey.
Not exact matches
Gaming History «Broken Toys On «Play The News»: «I think what bothers me the most about all this is that the game maker
essentially has
abdicated any responsibility for making a decision.»