Sentences with phrase «essentially suggesting no change»

Others answered in front of me, essentially suggesting no change.

Not exact matches

This does not mean that God is changed, if by that verb «changed» it is suggested that the divine nature if altered or becomes something essentially different from what it was before Christ's death and thus moves in and towards the world in a fashion totally at variance with the prior mode of divine concern.

The Hasting Center's Johnston suggests that Myriad and other owners of gene patents haven't really changed the gene — that it is still essentially a product of nature: «I'm sympathetic to people who say that it's like taking gold out of the ground,» Johnston says.

The more dynamic picture in the new simulations suggests that the rate of change in the first half of this century — which does not involve a significant contribution from processes like marine ice - cliff instability, or hydrofracturing — is essentially uncorrelated with the rate of change later in the century.

The treatment has essentially cured almost all the participants, suggesting a transformative change is on the horizon in how this previously incurable genetic disease is treated.

Essentially, the data we viewed suggest that while you may have a good experience when you apply for a mortgage with DiTech, your view may change once DiTech is managing your monthly payments.

Nothing about my posts suggests as a whole X1 is winning in total sales or that ps4 doesn't have less supply like in Australia but again that doesn't change the fact that at least up until last count they were both essentially neck n neck, also although it seems X1 has better supply after launch ps4 has been available through many retailers off and on with quick sellouts, again though not sure about allocations also better stock on micros part is a positive.

It essentially suggests that polluters don't really need to pay for the carbon reductions, and that nothing else in the economic system really needs to change.

Thanks for the 3 papers, the 1st was a real eye openner but was essentially confirming what I said which is that most model attribution expts based on comparison of historical forcing and runs held at pre - industrial condition suggest long term change is essentially forced.The point is the Karnauskas paper bucks the trend in understanding as expressed by the Ipcc (the consensus or whatever).

This study therefore suggests the rapid response to CO2 forcing is (apart from a possible small negative response from LW water vapour) essentially confined to cloud fraction changes affecting SW radiation, and further that significant feedbacks with temperature occur in all cloud components (including this one), and indeed in all other classically understood «feedbacks».

The more dynamic picture in the new simulations suggests that the rate of change in the first half of this century — which does not involve a significant contribution from processes like marine ice - cliff instability, or hydrofracturing — is essentially uncorrelated with the rate of change later in the century.

Some here have suggested that this could essentially never happen — that methane will only trickle out at such a low rate that it will now be a significant game changes, since it decays into CO2 and water in a few years.

I didn't know the specifics regarding why the soil won't work for wheat, but I had essentially raised this point on the «Cockburn's form» among others regarding how crops are already adapted to specific soils which exist in specific climates — and you can't just pick up the soil and move it as appropriate climate moves northward when one skeptic / optimist suggested climate change would be beneficial.