Sentences with phrase «established at brokerages»

Not exact matches

GFI Development is the real estate development branch of GFI Group, which according to the company website «has been at the forefront of credit derivative brokerage services, leadership that we are now leveraging to help establish an active, liquid Exotic Credit Derivative market.»

Establishing the initial position would involve just one trade, or an extra $ 10 at most brokerages.

If they pass the Mortgage Broker Education Program, FSCO must establish that they reside in Ontario and work at a licensed brokerage to issue an individual the license allowing them to practice as a mortgage broker in Ottawa, ON.

You can even try your hand at trading through a stock brokerage affiliated with your current bank, with institutions like BPI, Metrobank, and RCBC already having an established presence in the niche.

With some of the leading Binary Options providers growing at a decent rate, it appears that Binary Options providers are ready to start directly competing with the already established Forex brokerages.

You can establish an IRA at a bank, a brokerage house, or any other qualified financial institution.

Coinbase, a brokerage that established itself as one of the biggest brands in a now - booming cryptocurrency market, has raised $ 100 million at a private valuation of $ 1.6 billion that includes the capital raised, the company tells Fortune.

Europe's highest law court first began looking into bitcoin taxation in June last year after the Swedish tax office challenged a court decision which ruled that transactions in the digital currency should be exempt from VAT, following a dispute with Daniel Hedqvist, a forum operator who at the time wanted to establish a bitcoin brokerage.

At least one, major brand, established brokerage in the GTA filed for bankruptcy earlier this year.

Building a thriving team environment at your brokerage means establishing openness and transparency.

- RE / MAX offered 100 % to agents at launch in the 80's - Ontario government deemed employees could not get 100 % so the 95 % concept began in mid 80's - Independent Contractor became an option for Ontario agents eliminating the employee tag in late 80's - Court cases established Validity of Independent Contractor Status in early 90's and ability to offer 100 % to any independent contractor - late 90's transaction fees became optional tradeoff for commission points to agents - mid 2000's independent brokerages (no franchise affiliation) began to charge transaction fees only

At this point you've asked yourself (and answered) many of the important questions to determine how you'll establish and grow a profitable brokerage business.

The professionals at Inland Real Estate Brokerage, Inc. offer a breadth of market knowledge and established business contacts and relationships with investors and real estate professionals nationwide.

Cutler v. Tommy Hilfiger U.S.A. (237 A.D. 2d 193)- non-jury trial awarding brokerage commission unanimously affirmed; broker established that she had shown apartment to defendant, he agreed to pay her a brokerage fee, shortly thereafter the broker indicated to him through his business agent that the apartment was available at his price and he subsequently purchased the apartment through the corporate defendant; joint and several liability was proper of the individual and corporate defendant.

Abrams Realty Corp. v. Elo (279 A.D. 2d 261)- trial evidence establishes that broker was the procuring cause of sale of property; brokerage agreement was not unenforceable for its failure to specify rate at which broker's commission would be computed since it was clear that broker did not agree to work without compensation and that the parties understood that the broker would be compensated at the prevailing, normal and accepted rates; trial court properly rejected attempt to evade obligation to pay broker's commission by endeavoring to characterize the transaction as merely the assignment of a successful bid

Joseph P. Day Realty Corp. v. Chera (308 A.D. 2d 148)- broker's complaint for commissions reinstated where questions of fact exist as to whether broker was the procuring cause of a commercial tenant and if there was an implied contract which arose from landlord's acceptance of the benefits of broker's services; broker must plead and prove a contract of employment, express or implied, and in the absence of an express contract, an implied contract may be established in some cases by the mere acceptance of the labors of the broker; broker failed to establish that it was a third party beneficiary of lease agreement between landlord and tenant where provisions in lease merely provided for indemnification between the parties and did not expressly set forth that one party would be obligated to pay the broker's commission; indemnification provisions in the lease agreement do provide evidence of implied contract of employment with landlord where landlord agreed to indemnify tenant against brokerage commission claims from all brokers including plaintiff and where, to the contrary, tenant's reciprocal indemnification excluded plaintiff; triable issues of fact exist as to whether broker was the procuring cause where broker introduced the parties, showed the space to tenant's representatives, was involved in weekly negotiations with the parties over the lease terms, conveyed offers on behalf of tenant to landlord and participated in the meeting with the landlord and tenant at which the lease terms were finalized

107 DOS 98 Matter of DOS v. Sosis - subject matter jurisdiction; due process; failure to appear at hearing; proper business practices; deposits; fraudulent practice; DOS fails its burden of proof; DOS has subject matter jurisdiction if at the time the disciplinary proceeding was commenced by proper service of a notice of hearing and complaint the party was (i) licensed to engage in regulated real estate activities, or (ii) an applicant for either a license or for the renewal of a license to engage in regulated real estate activities, or (iii) eligible to automatically renew the prior license under the two - year limitation provision of RPL § 441 (2); ex parte hearing is permissible upon proof of proper notice of hearing; DOS has subject matter jurisdiction where party was licensed at the time proceeding was commenced and, where at time of hearing, although not licensed was eligible to automatically apply to renew pursuant to RPL § 441 (2); licensee operated a real estate brokerage business under an unlicensed name; licensee unlawfully retains deposit funds after deposit monies were delivered on the condition that same were to be disbursed only on the principal's consent and approval and said consent and approval was not given; licensee's illegal exercise of right of ownership over his principal's funds spawns conversion and constitutes a fraudulent practice; DOS fails its burden of proof to establish licensee failed to deposit trust funds in a segregated escrow account, engaged in fraud and changed business location without notice to DOS; restitution ordered in the amount of $ 1,900 plus interest, fine of $ 1,000 and any further application for licensure shall not be considered until applicant pays said fine and provides proof of payment of restitution

7 DOS 00 DOS v. Flagship Marketing Group - availing of license; failure to cooperate with DOS investigation; jurisdiction; proper business practices; ex parte hearing may proceed upon proof of proper service; DOS retains jurisdiction over party not licensed at the time of the hearing where, at that time the complaint was served, the party was (i) licensed, (ii) an applicant for a license or renewal, or (iii) was eligible to automatically renew; salesperson is prohibited both from owning, directly or indirectly, singly or jointly, any shares of voting stock in and from being an officer of any licensed real estate brokerage corporation with which the salesperson is associated; representative real estate broker availed the corporate broker license to an associated salesperson where the office was operated by the salesperson without the direct supervision of the representative broker and the salesperson conducted business as a broker for his own benefit; representative real estate broker engaged in fraud by availing the corporate real estate broker license to a salesperson; representative broker's availing of corporate broker's license for which the corporate broker is vicariously liable; failure to provide business records constitutes failure to cooperate with DOS investigation; DOS fails to establish fraud, ignorance or negligence is not sufficient to prove mistake; pressure, regardless of how severe, is not undue influence; restitution denied where funds sought were received by an entity not named or charged in the complaint; corporate broker fined $ 3,000.00, representative broker's license revoked and fined $ 3,000.00 and salesperson fined $ 5,000.00

112 DOS 99 Matter of DOS v. Dorfman - adjournments; proper business practices; failure to appear at hearing; failure to cooperate with DOS investigation; accounting to client; ex parte hearing may proceed upon proof of proper service; individually licensed broker seeking to conduct brokerage business under a name other than his own must apply for a license under such new name; broker engaged in the leasing of real property through an unlicensed corporation; broker failed to cooperate with DOS investigation by failing to respond to DOS letters and telephone calls; complaint alleges broker failed to provide an accounting or copies of records of management for owner's property; broker may be required to return commissions and fees received which he is not entitled to; $ 1,000.00 fine and suspension of broker's license until such time as broker establishes he has fully complied with DOS's investigation and made a full and satisfactory accounting to owner, shall have paid to owner all money due and owning to him as established by the accounting, with interest, and shall have refunded to owner all commissions and other fees, with interest, paid

Establish a value proposition that agents and clients clearly understand and start living that identity every day at your brokerage, whether it's «problem solvers,» «negotiation experts,» «advocates,» or «gladiators.»

and broker / owner Paul Fitzpatrick has a history of success and a strong market presence and has established At Home Realty Group as a leading independent brokerage in the market,» says Aventure Realty Network president Bernie Vogt.

In conjunction with the above, the Rules require that: (1) a brokerage providing strata management services must establish in its service agreement the brokerage's scope of authority to sign cheques and make disbursements on behalf of its strata corporation clients [section 5 - 1 (5.1)(c)(i)-RSB-; and (2) the service agreement include a brokerage's authority to transfer amounts between brokerage trust accounts maintained for the strata corporation under section 7 - 9 (2) of the Rules [section 5 - 1 (5.1)(b)(i)-RSB-; Therefore, the Real Estate Council, when investigating complaints or conducting an audit regarding a brokerage, will look at service agreements to determine a brokerage's scope of authority relative to withdrawal of funds from trust accounts.

An amendment to section 5 - 15 of the Council Rules establishes that referral fees may be considered earned and paid out from brokerage trust accounts once the terms of the agreement for their payment have been fulfilled, or at a time otherwise agreed to in writing by the payer.