Not exact matches
In view of all that inheres in the first four «words» and in the light of what is there already affirmed both explicitly and
by inference; in consideration of ancient Eastern modes of thought and the characteristic psychological identification one always made of his own life with the life of immediate and also more distant progenitors; in recognition of the meaning of Covenant, together with Israel's faith in God's creation and his continuing exercise of the powers and prerogatives of Creator and Sustainer - in acknowledgment of all this it is apparent that the intention of the fifth commandment is to
establish and perpetuate not merely the parental but
by and through the parental the divine claim upon every life in Israel.
While the various methods can be tested with climate model simulations, it would arguably be more satisfying if
inferences could be obtained in a manner which bypasses the difficult issue of calibration entirely, and also eliminates any need to
establish the precise seasonality of information reflected
by the various available proxy records.
You can not
by inference trouser the cultural strengths of western Europe and North America as belonging to secularism since they were
established — going back to the enlightemnent and renaissance — in a firmly Christian context.
In respect of (2), the Court of Appeal reiterated the test to
establish the defence of fair comment, being: (a) the comment must be on a matter of public interest; (b) the comment must be based on fact; (c) the comment, though it can include
inferences of fact, must be recognisable as comment; (d) whether the person honestly express that opinion on the proved facts; and (e) whether the defendant was actuated
by express malice.
The question on this appeal is whether the trial judge erred in law in the manner in which she addressed what remained of the Crown's case: that the driving was such a marked departure from the standard expected as to
establish mens rea on an objective basis
by inference and attribution, and that the respondent's own evidence did not support an exculpatory defence.
Answering this question inevitably requires the judge to engage in a limited weighing of the evidence because, with circumstantial evidence, there is,
by definition, an inferential gap between the evidence and the matter to be
established — that is, an inferential gap beyond the question of whether the evidence should be believed... The judge must therefore weigh the evidence, in the sense of assessing whether it is reasonably capable of supporting the
inferences that the Crown asks the jury to draw.
The
inference which necessarily results is that the Constitution ordained and
established by those people, and, still closely to apply the case, in particular
by the people of Georgia, could vest jurisdiction or judicial power over those states and over the State of Georgia in particular.
The applicant is not required to provide evidence that proves directly or
by inference the facts necessary to
establish the claim.