Not exact matches
Graham
and Whitefield were both products of a culture that assumed Christianity's
established status, either by
fact or by
law (or both, in Whitefield's England).
In
fact it is more likely that evolution can continue indefinitely (within the parameters
established by the
laws of thermodynamics),
and for all we know, the present moment may still be very early in the full unfolding of the universe.
Wilson bristles at the example -
and yet it appears that he still hasn't taken hold of the point: the
fact that 95 percent of the people in the country «loved their children» would still not
establish why the
law is justified in protecting those children at the hands of those parents.
On the other hand, God must so act in the interests of both the self
and all others as thereby to
establish the cosmic order of natural
law that sets the optimal limits of all other action, where by «optimal limits» I mean limits such that, were they to be set otherwise than they are, the ratio between opportunities for good
and risks of evil would be less rather than more favorable than it in
fact is.
The
fact that
established law, created under the Clinton administration was upheld,
and how it applies to «persons»
and corporations who can be legally identified as «persons» are what we are talking about.
Has a religion that wishes to control government,
laws and public policy been
established from that
fact?
Acting leader Vince Cable said it was «essential» to
establish the
facts and for anyone that has broken the
law to face the consequences of their actions.
Education
law, as summarized by the New York State School Boards Association
and the New York State Bar Association, says the burden of proof rests on the entity or person who challenges vote results to
establish facts that would justify invalidating results.
We were told, in a written response «once all necessary documents in the
established removal process are filed» they will review the record as quickly as possible
and allow «for a thorough
and complete consideration of the
facts and relevant
law.»
But even if the bill becomes
law and the research
established fact, just how hard will it be to police the Net from day to day?
There were many problems, the foremost of which was the
fact that there were no
established leasehold
laws or precedents,
and several
laws had to be passed for this project to happen.
Article 56 TFEU requires not only the elimination of all discrimination against providers of services on grounds of nationality or the
fact that they are
established in a Member State other than that where the services are to be provided, but also the abolition of any restriction, even if it applies without distinction to national providers of services
and to those of other Member States, which is liable to prohibit, impede or render less advantageous the activities of a provider of services
established in another Member State where he lawfully provides similar services (Case C ‑ 475 / 11 Konstantinides [2013] ECR, paragraph 44
and the case -
law cited).
And when a factual scenario presents novel or troublesome facts that seem not to fit established law, students are taught to engage in rule synthesis.207 In other words, the legal writing classroom is rich with opportunities to practice deduction and induction in ways that incorporate both theory and practical applicati
And when a factual scenario presents novel or troublesome
facts that seem not to fit
established law, students are taught to engage in rule synthesis.207 In other words, the legal writing classroom is rich with opportunities to practice deduction
and induction in ways that incorporate both theory and practical applicati
and induction in ways that incorporate both theory
and practical applicati
and practical application.
Notwithstanding the
fact that the employee likely did not have the «right» to take the time off to care for his children under the Ontario Employment Standards Act, 2000, the
law is clear that: (a) the ESA
establishes certain minimum standards only,
and (b) the Human Rights Code does, very clearly, contemplate one's «family status» as a protected ground.
Polls have at various times
established that not just a quarter, but up to 40 per cent of US lawyers want to leave their profession;
and whereas British lawyers are only just waking up to the
fact they are miserable
and want to die, their American counterparts have been alert to it since 1989, which saw the publication of Deborah Arron's Running From the
Law: Why Good Lawyers are Getting Out of the Legal Profession.
It also makes clear that the criteria
established in preceding case -
law are mere guidelines which interrelate
and have to be discussed against the background of the respective
facts of each individual case.
So, ignoring the every day English language meaning of the words, is there in
fact a clear
and precise definition of «assault» (in which case some sources are simply using it incorrectly), or do I just need to accept that there is confusion, even within the
law itself,
and rely on context to
establish in any given instance which meaning is meant?
As the
law now stands, according to Imerman, it is a well
established fact that there is a right to privacy
and confidence enshrined in the English
law.
Whilst the case does not in
fact establish any new case
law, it serves as a compelling reminder that the mutual trust
and cooperation obligation does not require parties to act any differently under NEC3 than with other forms of construction contracts
and should not be held as an axe to discourage a party in circumstances where it may have a valid claim.
For civil
law purposes, an excuse of self - defence based on non-existent
facts that were honestly but unreasonably believed to exist has to fail; the belief has to have been reasonably held,
and it may be that even that will not suffice to
establish the defence.
The
fact that Mrs. Alonso was
established in UK, was familiar with the aforementioned
law and had previously helped almost 200 clients in the same situation reassured Mr.
and Mrs. Maby needed to trust Mrs Alonso
and her team.
This makes them quite different from normal appeals, which involve cases that arise out of specific concrete circumstances, that come with a context that has been judicially explored by the lower courts, that have an
established set of relevant
facts that have been tested through an adversary process,
and that are essentially retrospective, arriving at general
and abstract questions only as they emerge from those concrete
fact and law circumstances.
The lawyers at Preszler
Law in Vancouver will piece together the
facts of your injury
and consult with the best medical experts to
establish firm ground that leads to a timely, fair
and just settlement.
The Federal Arbitration Act (the Act) makes arbitration agreements «valid, irrevocable,
and enforceable, save upon such grounds as exist at
law or in equity for the revocation of any contract,» 9 U.S.C. ¶ 2,
establishes an equal - treatment principle: A court may invalidate an arbitration agreement based on «generally applicable contract defenses,» but not on legal rules that «apply only to arbitration or that derive their meaning from the
fact that an agreement to arbitrate is at issue,» AT&T Mobility, LLC v. Concepcion, 563 U.S. 333, 339.
As reported on our Local Government
Law blog, the Court of Appeal reined in the effect of the Supreme Court decision, pointing out that it merely endorsed
established principles
and provided an illustration of their application to the
facts of that case.
The suggestion that the beneficial quality of appellants» proposed construction is
established by the
fact that the construction would have been consistent with applicable zoning
laws ignores the development in sensibilities
and ideals reflected in landmark legislation like New York City's.
The Chief Commissioner reached the opposite conclusion, but the Court of Appeal found he relied upon
facts and reasoning extraneous to the
established law.
As explained by counsel in that case, Mark West, in 2011 Civil Justice Quarterly 367, Hobhouse J had in
fact been shown a «considerable volume of authority» which, in short,
established and confirmed that common
law counts for money had
and received were actions upon the case,
and were expressly accorded a six - year period (as were actions of account) by the terms of s 3 of the Limitation Act 1623.
Although the mere
fact that the impugned legislation takes into account the claimant's traits or circumstances will not necessarily be sufficient to defeat a s. 15 (1) claim, it will generally be more difficult to
establish discrimination to the extent that the
law takes into account the claimant's actual situation in a manner that respects his or her value as a human being or member of Canadian society,
and less difficult to do so where the
law fails to take into account the claimant's actual situation.
The
fact that the majority of population can not obtain legal services at reasonable cost will eventually result in these solutions: (1) the Ontario government
establishing a competing string of
law offices providing legal services at cost, thus reducing the
law society's monopoly over the provision of legal services;
and, (2) the right to legal services at reasonable cost becoming a constitutional right.
[1] Before that, many
law colleges were focused on shaping the «self», whereas, the new university curriculum «emphasized testing
and criticizing beliefs in order to build up a body of well
established «
facts» that are supported by a true understanding of the principles according to which things work».
The claimants submitted, inter alia, that the orders: (i) had been made without any prior consultation as to the principle, relying upon the common
law duty to act fairly
and / or the doctrine of procedural legitimate expectation;
and (ii) were irrational on the basis that the reasons which had been put forward by the defendants in justification of the decision were inconsistent
and contradictoryDyson LJ: The
fact that, when conferring on the lord chancellor the power to prescribe court fees, parliament had decided whom he should consult before doing so, militated strongly against the idea that there should co-exist a common
law duty to consult more widely (in the absence of a clear promise by the lord chancellor that there would be wider consultation
and in the absence of any clear
established practice of wider consultation).
The «systems integrity» of such large
and complex ERMSs as is Rogers system, requires in
fact but not yet in
law, certification of compliance with
established, authoritative standards such as the National Standards of Canada for ERMSs or with those of the International Organization for Standardization (the ISO).
«Nowadays, district judges are often required not only to decide the outcome of a case but also to tease out from the parties the issues, then
establish the
facts, ascertain the area of
law involved
and then determine the outcome following statue
and common
law.»
Other government officials generally have only «qualified immunity» which means that they have liability if they intentionally violate clearly
established law, which basically means that there is a binding judicial precedent governing the
facts and circumstances at issue.
The
facts in each case were simple
and the
law well -
established, but the judgments provide a refreshing reminder of what constitutes negligence on the part of an individual.
Human Resource Specialist (1998 — 1999) • Oversee compliance with all state
and federal regulations, labor
laws,
and company policies • Assist employees with questions regarding compensation, benefits programs, duties,
and disciplinary measures • Review disciplinary reports for compliance with
established regulations
and mediate employee reviews
and conflicts • Prepare supporting documentation
and present
facts for unemployment
and EEOC claims
(c) if the native title rights
and interests asserted are capable of recognition by the common
law then the
facts necessary for the recognition of those rights
and interests by the common
law are
established.
City One Real Estate, LLC v. 535 Carlton Avenue Realty Corp. (300 A.D. 2d 337)-- broker
established its entitlement to judgment as a matter of
law on two separate contracts by submitting a copy of the leases between landlord
and its tenant wherein landlord promised to pay broker $ 50,000 for its brokerage services; landlord
and tenant failed to come forward with evidence sufficient to raise a triable issue of
fact as to their claim that they collectively owed the broker only one $ 50,000 commission for services in connection with leasing the two premises.
R.R. Ragette, Inc. v. D'Incecco (17 A.D. 3d 436) broker
established its entitlement to judgment as a matter of
law by demonstrating that it earned its commission by procuring a buyer who was ready, willing
and able to purchase seller's property in accordance will the seller's terms; seller failed to raise a triable issue of
fact; judgment for broker affirmed.
Town & Country Southampton, Inc. v. Grey (299 A.D. 2d 541)-- to recover a commission, a broker must
establish that he or she is duly licensed, that he or she has a contract, express or implied, with the party charged with paying the commission,
and that he or she was the procuring cause of the sale or lease; broker's unsupported
and conclusory allegation of bad faith failed to raise triable issues of
fact where defendant's made prima facieshowing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of
law on the ground that neither the broker or its agent was a procuring cause of the lease.