In diverse communities around the world people have
established secular states so that people of different religions can live together freely and in peace.
Not exact matches
The idea of
Secular Nationalism and
Secular State were the creation of cooperation between Gandhi's reformed religion and Nehru's liberal humanist secularism and they succeeded to
establish itself in India against the idea of Hindu and Muslim communalism.
For that reason only we find now the ruling powers are in the hands of
secular non religious ones... The conference above
stated that the
secular regimes in the West had used the indifference between religions, branches, doctrines by creating «Fitnah» said to be harder than killing... because you get all those with Fitnah to fight among them selves... beside
establishing and supporting terrorist groups to get the area unstable far from investment and development environment that has caused the mass immigration of the capital heads, professions and skilled labour hands from their countries to the west and be treated as garbage at countries that they do not belong to whether as culture, race or religion....
Modernity's emphasis on secularism involves three elements - a) the desacralisation of nature which produced a nature devoid of spirits preparing the way for its scientific analysis and technological control and use; b) desacralisation of society and
state by liberating them from the control of
established authority and laws of religion which often gave spiritual sanction to social inequality and stifled freedom of reason and conscience of persons; it was necessary to affirm freedom and equality as fundamental rights of all persons and to enable common action in politics and society by adherents of all religions and none in a religiously pluralistic society; and c) an abandonment of an eternally fixed sacred order of human society enabling ordering of
secular social affairs on the basis of rational discussion.
Where the magisterium does not reject a
secular doctrine as directly or indirectly opposed to Revelation, it can only note the degree of probability attributed to the theory by
secular science,
state this and take it into account for the purpose of its own reflections, but can not
establish and pronounce upon it.
Last month, Nepal adopted a new constitution that
establishes it as a
secular country, but still requires the
state to protect Hinduism.
The only path available today is, either the domination of the majority religion or
secular ideology as the
established framework of the
State suppressing the rights of others using
State coercion or open democratic secularism in which a consensus is sought regarding the values and directions of the common life of society and the
State policy related to that common life, through peaceful but active dialogue among religions and ideologies.
Nevertheless, the logical goal of this «secularist» (as different from an «open
secular») interpretation is that the
State should be a sort of anti-theo «theocracy» with some anti-religious ideology as its
established «quasi-religion», promoting secularization of all public life.
The word «Secularism» is used in India usually in relation to the idea of the
Secular State which has been
established in the religiously pluralistic context of India.
Similarly, they did not merely say there should be separation of church and
state; rather, they actually separated them by (1)
establishing a
secular government on the power of «We the people» (not a deity), (2) saying nothing to connect that government to god (s) or religion, (3) saying nothing to give that government power over matters of god (s) or religion, and (4), indeed, saying nothing substantive about god (s) or religion at all except in a provision precluding any religious test for public office.
The Supreme Court, in cases culminating in Agostini [v. Felton], has
established the general principle that
state educational assistance programs do not have the primary effect of advancing religion if those programs provide public aid to both sectarian and nonsectarian institutions (1) on the basis of neutral,
secular criteria that neither favor nor disfavor religion; and (2) only as a result of numerous private choices of the individual parents of school - age children.
The PQ would like the bill amended to
establish a hierarchy of rights, giving priority to the equality of women and men, the primacy of the French language and affirming that Quebec is a
secular state.