Sentences with phrase «establishing general rights»

At least they do nail the research tree where you can spend the city's combined brainpower to investigate new technology, advancing through stuff like basic automobiles, establishing general rights, electricity, televisions, satellites and more.

In referring to FIA 2000, Judge LJ noted that although it establishes a general right of access to information which lies within the possession of public authorities, such a right is subject to exemptions.

Not exact matches

NBCUniversal reserves the right to modify or discontinue, temporarily or permanently, all or any part of this Site and / or any software, facilities and services on this Site, with or without notice, and / or to establish general guidelines and limitations on their use.

The actions through which Muslims uphold their interests and repel evils in themselves, between themselves and their neighbors, and between Muslims and non-Muslims, the actions through which they prevent maltreatment, preserve rights, fulfill the general good, and establish peace and security, are known in Islam as dealings.

Now, in the absence in the Qur» an of any further elaboration on these subjects, any clear details as to how these duties are to be performed, it is obvious that through these references the Qur» an establishes the authority of the Sunnah, and grants to it the right to elaborate and define the general precepts of the Qur» an.

In particular it notes General Recommendation No. 24 which «established that the criminalization of medical practices which only apply to women, like abortion, constitute a violation of equal rights,» (6.5.2) and the Committee's 1999 comments to Colombia calling their abortion laws a violation of Article 12.

We, the people of Puerto Rico, in order to organize ourselves politically on a fully democratic basis, to promote the general welfare, and to secure for ourselves and our posterity the complete enjoyment of human rights, placing our trust in Almighty God, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the commonwealth which, in the exercise of our natural rights, we now create within our union with the United States of America.

In a goodwill message to the participants, the Theatre Commander Operation Lafiya Dole, Major General Rogers Nicholas told the gathering that the current Service Chiefs of the Armed Forces of Nigeria established Human Rights Desks at all Services and Formation Headquarters to meet the dictates of global best practices.

Earlier, while introducing members of the Governing Council, the State's Attorney General and Commissioner for Justice, Mr. Adeniji Kazeem recalled that the CMC was established in 1999 as a unit under the Directorate of Citizens» Right of the Lagos State Ministry of Justice before it emerged as an entity by law in 2007 to provide speedy free legal services to the needy and residents of the State irrespective of tribe, race and religion.

The Supreme Court's 2007 decision in Morse v. Frederick continued the post-1975 pattern of sympathy with schools that are facing challenges to their disciplinary authority, but did not, as some of the media coverage implied, alter the general contours of student rights as previously established.

To enforce the constitutional right to vote, to confer jurisdiction upon the district courts of the United States to provide injunctive relief against discrimination in public accommodations, to authorize the Attorney General to institute suits to protect constitutional rights in public facilities and public education, to extend the Commission on Civil Rights, to prevent discrimination in federally assisted programs, to establish a Commission on Equal Employment Opportunity, and for other purrights in public facilities and public education, to extend the Commission on Civil Rights, to prevent discrimination in federally assisted programs, to establish a Commission on Equal Employment Opportunity, and for other purRights, to prevent discrimination in federally assisted programs, to establish a Commission on Equal Employment Opportunity, and for other purposes.

A three - model lineup would go a long way toward establishing the General's novelty brand as the third major force in the world of four - wheeling, right alongside Land Rover and Jeep.

We have a highly competent staff on hand to assist the right individual in our busy, well established general practice.

It tries to cover so much ground over such a short space of time in order to conform to the established format that, whilst in a general sense it hits all the right notes and goes out of its way to offer players a more grounded, recognizable, and ultimately more human glimpse at the nature of war, it's never really given the chance to expand on its themes or characters.

Victor, you no right to complain about lack of response, meaningful or otherwise, since you are guilty of practicing what you preach against: You have not responded — meaningfully or otherwise — to my comments at 120 and 156, in which I exposed the general illogic underling all your argumentation, this general illogic being the falsity that, given a cause and effect relationship established by the laws of physics, effects not manifesting as strongly as we would like is somehow some sort of legitimate argument that this cause and effect relationship established by the laws of physics is false.

I clicked on the «Settled Principles» tab to find 30 well - settled principles for public records, such as this statement from a California appellate decision, «[I] t is well established that the media has no greater right of access to public records than the general public,» and this from a Florida court, «It is well - settled that public records and reports or business records are admissible as an exception to the hearsay rule provided they are authenticated by a custodian.»

In a frequently cited decision, the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario (HRTO) confirmed that it does not have the power to deal with general allegations of unfairness, and dismissed a human rights complaint on the basis that the applicant had not established a clear link between her termination and a protected ground under the Human Rights Code (the Rights Tribunal of Ontario (HRTO) confirmed that it does not have the power to deal with general allegations of unfairness, and dismissed a human rights complaint on the basis that the applicant had not established a clear link between her termination and a protected ground under the Human Rights Code (the rights complaint on the basis that the applicant had not established a clear link between her termination and a protected ground under the Human Rights Code (the Rights Code (the Code).

In a frequently cited decision, the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario (HRTO) confirmed that it does not have the power to deal with general allegations of unfairness, and dismissed a human rights complaint on the basis that the applicant had not established a clear link between her termination and a protected ground under the Human Rights -LSRights Tribunal of Ontario (HRTO) confirmed that it does not have the power to deal with general allegations of unfairness, and dismissed a human rights complaint on the basis that the applicant had not established a clear link between her termination and a protected ground under the Human Rights -LSrights complaint on the basis that the applicant had not established a clear link between her termination and a protected ground under the Human Rights -LSRights -LSB-...]

Further muddying the waters, is the General Data Protection Regulation, in force in summer 2018 across the EU's member states, which will effectively establish a right to privacy (as opposed to the right to «private life»), with extra territorial effect: countries which exchange data with EU residents must abide by its fundamental principles, in line with the CJEU's guidance as to the proportionate approach to be taken by our societies in relation to our increasing data production.

As a result, a regime of general data retention should be established on the basis of measures adopted by a legislative authority, that are accessible and foreseeable while offering adequate protection against arbitrary interference with the rights of privacy and data protection (§ 153).

«The Attorney General of Canada contends that «generic evidence» of human rights conditions in the receiving state can not establish, on its own, that the person sought faces a substantial risk of torture or mistreatment.

A recent decision of the B.C. Human Rights Tribunal, Cummings v. Nenan Dane Zaa Deh Zona Family Services Society, demonstrates that a complainant can not rely as a general matter on a self - diagnosis when trying to establish a mental disability or a disability that is not self - evident.

In the context of such a scheme in Germany which had been negotiated by the social partners as an important element of an overall scheme to eradicate an old age - based payment scheme which was about to become illegal, they held that the protection of the established rights of one category of persons can in general justify a measure restrictive of equality if that restriction does not go beyond what is necessary for that protection.

The Court of Claims was established in 1975 by the Ohio General Assembly, giving citizens the right to file civil suits against state agencies.

The Attorney General failed to establish that ``... retrospective application of the Abolition of Early Parole Act serves a pressing and substantial government objective, is rationally connected to that objective, minimally impairs the Charter right, and that its salutary benefits outweigh its detrimental effects.»

In Attorney General of Canada v Johnstone, 2014 FCA 110, the Federal Court of Appeal («FCA») established a new test for determining whether an employer has discriminated against an employee on the basis of «family status» under the Canadian Human Rights Act («CHRA»).

Following general principles of human rights jurisprudence, the onus is initially on the complainant in a human rights complaint to establish that he or she has suffered discrimination on a prohibited ground set out in the human rights legislation.

It is also acknowledged that Justice Minister Jody Wilson - Raybould stated, on behalf of the Government of Canada at the Assembly of First Nations Annual General Meeting in Niagara Falls in July 2016, that the Liberal Government policy is to anticipate how Aboriginal and Treaty Rights will eventually be articulated by the Supreme Court of Canada so as to act accordingly, by establishing policies that «fill the section 35 rights box» in advance of slow and expensive Indigenous rights decisions from the Supreme Court of CRights will eventually be articulated by the Supreme Court of Canada so as to act accordingly, by establishing policies that «fill the section 35 rights box» in advance of slow and expensive Indigenous rights decisions from the Supreme Court of Crights box» in advance of slow and expensive Indigenous rights decisions from the Supreme Court of Crights decisions from the Supreme Court of Canada.

In our view, it is difficult to reconcile the Supreme Court of Canada's 1988 decision in BCGEU v. British Columbia (Attorney General), confirming that every Canadian citizen has the fundamental right to unimpeded access to the courts, with the notion of Canada's superior courts operating as a default user - pay system of justice, subject to an individual establishing an entitlement to an exemption from court fees.

In § 164.526 of the final rule, we retain the general proposed approach, but establish an individual's right to have the covered entity amend, rather than amend or correct, protected health information.

But you can't in general «wander through private land» with impunity, you can only «wander through established rights of way» with impunity.

In the recent ruling of R. v. Cody, the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) reinforced the importance of the right to be tried within a reasonable time and rejected the invitation of the various provincial Attorneys General, who intervened in the matter, to revisit the time limits established in R. v. Jordan.

There is no established legal right through an insurance contract or by virtue of being a policy holder with a specific insurance firm, to any entitlement or direct interest in an insurance firm's general account.

In his dissent, Justice Kirby considered the interpretation of the LAA through examining legal authority, legal principles and legal policy which «demand respect for the legal rights to property of private individuals in Australia generally, and in particular the legal rights of Aboriginal Australians...» [68] He focused on the general principle of common law which requires that legislation depriving individuals of established legal rights must be clear and unambiguous: [69]

We the children of the divorcing parents, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish these Bill Of Rights for all children.