Being vague and indecisive in your methodology research proposal and
establishing wrong ideas will be a major disadvantage.
Not exact matches
New estimates for when our lineage and chimps went their separate ways suggest that some of our
established ideas are staggeringly
wrong.
The
wrong way to ensure equity in
IDEA is by
establishing quota - like systems designed to keep «too many» minority children from receiving additional services to which they may have a civil right.
To use formative assessment effectively, it is important to
establish a safe classroom environment where all students»
ideas, regardless of whether they are right or
wrong, are encouraged, respected, and valued.
That's not to say calls for openness are
wrong — but before complaining that someone is «hiding» data for some nefarious purpose, it is a very good
idea to
establish first whether it is likely that it matters in the first place.
As a scientist, the pressure actually is mostly reversed: you get rewarded if you prove an
established idea wrong.
You need to drop the
idea that a consensus of anything in science research will
establish the truth.It is NOT a rational, or valid way to determine something that was originally conjectured to explain something.It can take just ONE person to prove everybody else
wrong.
A fringe
idea is generally off the
established science track but not a-priori obviously
wrong.