Notably, Gorsuch questioned the continuing vitality of Lemon v. Kurtzman, the 1971 Supreme Court decision setting forth a three - pronged
establishment clause test which subsequently has been «criticized by many members of the Court, and a variety of legal scholars.»
Not exact matches
In the U.S., the
Establishment Clause of the 1st Amendment to the Constitution is always being
tested.
Under the
test, first proposed by Supreme Court Justice Sandra O'Connor in a 1984 case from Pawtucket, Rhode Island, a display violates the
Establishment Clause if it amounts to an official endorsement of religion, that is, if it suggests that the government approves a particular religious message (or disapproves such a message, though that issue does not regularly arise).
The required inquiry into «entanglement» has been modified and questioned, and in one case we have upheld state action against an
Establishment Clause challenge without applying the Lemon
test at all.
Thereafter, the Court applied the Lemon
test in
Establishment Clause cases, such as Aguilar v. Felton, 473 U.S. 402 (1985), overruled by Agostini v. Felton, 117 S. Ct. 1997 (1997) and its companion case, School Dist.
This Court has announced a three - part
test for determining whether a challenged state statute is permissible under the
Establishment Clause of the United States Constitution:
Courts traditionally turn to the Lemon
test when evaluating laws that might raise
Establishment Clause concerns.