Sentences with phrase «estate fraud matter»

Not exact matches

The firm represents clients in a wide variety of litigation and appellate matters, including matters involving real property, real estate finance, construction, development disputes and transactions, intellectual property disputes, business disputes, personal injury, fraud, shareholder disputes, and adversarial actions in bankruptcy court.

But all is not well at Standard Oil: the company is under investigation for fraud, the bank has pulled out of their real estate deal, trucks of oil are being stolen right from Morales» nose and to make matters worse, now Morales» seemingly perfect home life is starting to show cracks.

He represents diverse businesses and industries such as land developers, resort and hotel owners, entrepreneurs and start - up companies, real estate and leasing companies, commercial landlords and tenants in matters involving breach of contract, breach of warranty and business tort claims, as well as claims arising out of fraud allegations.

Douglas B. Thayer is a member of the firm's Litigation section with many years of trial experience in civil and criminal litigation involving fraud, embezzlement, and complex financial transactions, including but not limited to, high income complicated marital estates and probate matters.

In addition to New York trust and estate litigation and will contests, and on a selective basis, we also handle related commercial litigation, real estate litigation, tax controversies, and criminal fraud matters.

As for mortgage fraud, some of that expense is used in bringing Benchers (with no experience in real estate) up to speed on the issues so that they can adjudicate the matter.

Conor B. O'Croinin represents clients in a range of commercial litigation matters, including cases involving real estate transactions, corporate veil piercing, and allegations of fraud.

Manages a docket of civil litigation matters involving claims of breaches of fiduciary duty, fraud, misrepresentations, DTPA violations, and negligence involving prominent real estate brokers and agents

I represent individuals and small - to - mid-market businesses in litigation matters, including trade secrets, business owner disputes, fraud claims, real estate disputes, and breaches of contract.

Frank's litigation experience includes complex commercial / business disputes, lender liability, fraud, trade secret, real estate / leasing and gaming matters.

The firm's North Georgia lawyers have successfully represented clients in cases of breaches of contract, real estate disputes, employee fraud and theft, debt collections, franchise relations, Uniform Commercial Code issues, fraudulent real estate transfers, employment disputes, insurance coverage disputes, landlord - tenant relations, and a wide variety of other matters.

Stalwart Law Group attorneys regularly are called upon to litigate all types of commercial litigation matters, including breaches of contract, partnership disputes, real estate disputes, fraud claims, unfair competition claims, and others

The subject matter of litigation includes real estate fraud, non-disclosure disputes, professional negligence, breach of fiduciary duty, breach of contract, California Business & Professions Code, easement and boundary line disputes, to name a few.

In the professional malpractice area, Ellen has defended law firms against allegations of mishandling litigation and transactional matters; claims for securities fraud; allegations of overbilling; and allegations of mishandling trust and estate matters.

He has represented clients in matters involving partnership disputes, derivative actions, breach of fiduciary duty, fraud, theft of trade secrets and real estate disputes and transactions.

Prior to joining Shutts, Steven practiced in the New York City office of a large Northeast law firm, where he handled a variety of litigation matters, including those involving breach of contract, health care fraud, product liability, employment and labor law, subrogation, personal injury and real estate litigation.

It lists the common types of bad cheque and real estate frauds and the red flags that will help you spot a fraudulent matter.

Bill began practicing in 2004 and has represented both plaintiffs and defendants in consumer fraud issues, employment disputes, estate planning, bankruptcy, personal injury matters, business transactions, and contract disputes, just to name a few.

Often offshore disputes involve investment disputes, banking matters, commercial litigation, business disputes (including shareholder disputes), trusts and estates, fraud claims, cyber security, data breach, insurance and reinsurance.

WEL focuses on opinions, dispute resolution, litigation and mediation of estate, trust and related matters including issues of undue influence, decisional capacity, fraud, forgery, suspicious circumstances and technical breaches respecting testamentary instruments.

In addition to IRS matters, our taxation attorneys regularly appear in litigation related to contract disputes, fraud and conspiracy, breach of fiduciary duty, unfair trade practices, partnership disputes, personal injury, gaming, intellectual property, administrative hearings, real estate, construction claims and professional malpractice.

Spousal support, general collections, loan transactions and real estate matters can all be used as the front for one of these frauds.

The fraud team at Mishcon de Reya sits within a wider team of dispute resolution specialists, covering insolvency litigation, insurance disputes, banking and finance litigation, competition litigation, real estate litigation, intellectual property disputes, tax litigation, regulatory advice, corporate disputes, white - collar litigation, employment claims and family matters.

Experienced attorney, Harvard Law School, J.D. 1991 (cum laude), AV rated, Expertise in all aspects of investigation, discovery, depositions, and trial of complex commercial litigation matters, multi-district litigation, ownership of intellectual property, international child abduction under the Hague Convention, insurance coverage, legal malpractice, securities fraud, commercial real estate, tax disputes, employee disputes...

6 DOS 94 Matter of DOS v. Eagle Financial Services - motion to amend complaint; procedural due process; motion for severance; motion for stay of proceedings; adjournment; once issued, license is valid even if procured by fraud and voidable only in quasi-judicial proceeding; negotiating of mortgage loan requires real estate license; corporate licensee vicariously liable for conduct of unlicensed salesperson; failure to return and conversion of deposits

107 DOS 98 Matter of DOS v. Sosis - subject matter jurisdiction; due process; failure to appear at hearing; proper business practices; deposits; fraudulent practice; DOS fails its burden of proof; DOS has subject matter jurisdiction if at the time the disciplinary proceeding was commenced by proper service of a notice of hearing and complaint the party was (i) licensed to engage in regulated real estate activities, or (ii) an applicant for either a license or for the renewal of a license to engage in regulated real estate activities, or (iii) eligible to automatically renew the prior license under the two - year limitation provision of RPL § 441 (2); ex parte hearing is permissible upon proof of proper notice of hearing; DOS has subject matter jurisdiction where party was licensed at the time proceeding was commenced and, where at time of hearing, although not licensed was eligible to automatically apply to renew pursuant to RPL § 441 (2); licensee operated a real estate brokerage business under an unlicensed name; licensee unlawfully retains deposit funds after deposit monies were delivered on the condition that same were to be disbursed only on the principal's consent and approval and said consent and approval was not given; licensee's illegal exercise of right of ownership over his principal's funds spawns conversion and constitutes a fraudulent practice; DOS fails its burden of proof to establish licensee failed to deposit trust funds in a segregated escrow account, engaged in fraud and changed business location without notice to DOS; restitution ordered in the amount of $ 1,900 plus interest, fine of $ 1,000 and any further application for licensure shall not be considered until applicant pays said fine and provides proof of payment of restiMatter of DOS v. Sosis - subject matter jurisdiction; due process; failure to appear at hearing; proper business practices; deposits; fraudulent practice; DOS fails its burden of proof; DOS has subject matter jurisdiction if at the time the disciplinary proceeding was commenced by proper service of a notice of hearing and complaint the party was (i) licensed to engage in regulated real estate activities, or (ii) an applicant for either a license or for the renewal of a license to engage in regulated real estate activities, or (iii) eligible to automatically renew the prior license under the two - year limitation provision of RPL § 441 (2); ex parte hearing is permissible upon proof of proper notice of hearing; DOS has subject matter jurisdiction where party was licensed at the time proceeding was commenced and, where at time of hearing, although not licensed was eligible to automatically apply to renew pursuant to RPL § 441 (2); licensee operated a real estate brokerage business under an unlicensed name; licensee unlawfully retains deposit funds after deposit monies were delivered on the condition that same were to be disbursed only on the principal's consent and approval and said consent and approval was not given; licensee's illegal exercise of right of ownership over his principal's funds spawns conversion and constitutes a fraudulent practice; DOS fails its burden of proof to establish licensee failed to deposit trust funds in a segregated escrow account, engaged in fraud and changed business location without notice to DOS; restitution ordered in the amount of $ 1,900 plus interest, fine of $ 1,000 and any further application for licensure shall not be considered until applicant pays said fine and provides proof of payment of restimatter jurisdiction; due process; failure to appear at hearing; proper business practices; deposits; fraudulent practice; DOS fails its burden of proof; DOS has subject matter jurisdiction if at the time the disciplinary proceeding was commenced by proper service of a notice of hearing and complaint the party was (i) licensed to engage in regulated real estate activities, or (ii) an applicant for either a license or for the renewal of a license to engage in regulated real estate activities, or (iii) eligible to automatically renew the prior license under the two - year limitation provision of RPL § 441 (2); ex parte hearing is permissible upon proof of proper notice of hearing; DOS has subject matter jurisdiction where party was licensed at the time proceeding was commenced and, where at time of hearing, although not licensed was eligible to automatically apply to renew pursuant to RPL § 441 (2); licensee operated a real estate brokerage business under an unlicensed name; licensee unlawfully retains deposit funds after deposit monies were delivered on the condition that same were to be disbursed only on the principal's consent and approval and said consent and approval was not given; licensee's illegal exercise of right of ownership over his principal's funds spawns conversion and constitutes a fraudulent practice; DOS fails its burden of proof to establish licensee failed to deposit trust funds in a segregated escrow account, engaged in fraud and changed business location without notice to DOS; restitution ordered in the amount of $ 1,900 plus interest, fine of $ 1,000 and any further application for licensure shall not be considered until applicant pays said fine and provides proof of payment of restimatter jurisdiction if at the time the disciplinary proceeding was commenced by proper service of a notice of hearing and complaint the party was (i) licensed to engage in regulated real estate activities, or (ii) an applicant for either a license or for the renewal of a license to engage in regulated real estate activities, or (iii) eligible to automatically renew the prior license under the two - year limitation provision of RPL § 441 (2); ex parte hearing is permissible upon proof of proper notice of hearing; DOS has subject matter jurisdiction where party was licensed at the time proceeding was commenced and, where at time of hearing, although not licensed was eligible to automatically apply to renew pursuant to RPL § 441 (2); licensee operated a real estate brokerage business under an unlicensed name; licensee unlawfully retains deposit funds after deposit monies were delivered on the condition that same were to be disbursed only on the principal's consent and approval and said consent and approval was not given; licensee's illegal exercise of right of ownership over his principal's funds spawns conversion and constitutes a fraudulent practice; DOS fails its burden of proof to establish licensee failed to deposit trust funds in a segregated escrow account, engaged in fraud and changed business location without notice to DOS; restitution ordered in the amount of $ 1,900 plus interest, fine of $ 1,000 and any further application for licensure shall not be considered until applicant pays said fine and provides proof of payment of restimatter jurisdiction where party was licensed at the time proceeding was commenced and, where at time of hearing, although not licensed was eligible to automatically apply to renew pursuant to RPL § 441 (2); licensee operated a real estate brokerage business under an unlicensed name; licensee unlawfully retains deposit funds after deposit monies were delivered on the condition that same were to be disbursed only on the principal's consent and approval and said consent and approval was not given; licensee's illegal exercise of right of ownership over his principal's funds spawns conversion and constitutes a fraudulent practice; DOS fails its burden of proof to establish licensee failed to deposit trust funds in a segregated escrow account, engaged in fraud and changed business location without notice to DOS; restitution ordered in the amount of $ 1,900 plus interest, fine of $ 1,000 and any further application for licensure shall not be considered until applicant pays said fine and provides proof of payment of restitution