With all of this in mind, why do many real
estate practitioners agree to meet these strangers?
Not exact matches
In a major victory for real
estate, Data Distribution Technologies, LLC — a so - called patent troll that has been demanding patent licensing fees from real
estate companies — has
agreed to a settlement with the National Association of REALTORS ® that will prevent it from suing, or threatening to sue, real
estate practitioners, brokerages, MLSs and other companies in the real
estate industry that offer email alerts to consumers about new or updated listings.
Recently, the association got the Federal Trade Commission to
agree that new rules designed to clamp down on fraudulent offers aimed at distressed owners wouldn't be enforced against real
estate practitioners helping sellers complete a short sale.
With all the talk that has transpired around the subject of «mere postings» there hasn't been any kind of a follow - up by way of anecdote — here anyway — in relation to a Real
Estate Practitioner showing one of these listings and talking to the seller (s) about what they have
agreed to and what they understand about what they've
agreed to.
To the extent that I can
agree with that kind of sentiment this would be a good case in point, because it should be easy for a seller to decide not to participate in the DDF or the IDX — if they
agree with the counsel of their real
estate practitioner.
Homesellers and their real
estate practitioners usually share the goal of a quick and profitable sale, yet they don't always
agree on what it takes to get there, according to the findings of a recent survey.