And is it really as simple as replacing critical equivocation with sound
esthetic judgment?
Such a view destroys any basis for effective
esthetic judgment.
In the aristocratic view it is assumed that
esthetic judgments are relevant only to certain kinds of activity and are reserved for the aristocracy only.
Baldessari's Clement Greenberg (1966 — 68) quotes the critic's canonical text: «
ESTHETIC JUDGMENTS ARE GIVEN AND CONTAINED IN THE IMMEDIATE EXPERIENCE OF ART.
That includes more sign painting, such as Tips for Painters Who Want to Sell or a quote on «
esthetic judgments» from Clement Greenberg.
Baldessari's Clement Greenberg (1966 - 68) quotes the critic's canonical text: «
ESTHETIC JUDGMENTS ARE GIVEN AND CONTAINED IN THE IMMEDIATE EXPERIENCE OF ART.
Although Greenberg did not wrestle into submission the elusive concept of taste — the word has too many contradictory meanings in his writings — he did not shy away from
esthetic judgments, dismissing Pop art as «academic» and, in the 1950s, even claiming that Abstract Expressionism and Art Informel had «a chance of being the worst art ever beheld under the name of art.»
Not exact matches
It is here assumed that
judgments of worth in the
esthetic, moral, and religious fields require a similar presupposition of the givenness of an order of value which is to be discovered and universally recognized and honored.
Judgments about manners are made by applying the principles of
esthetic excellence to the field of human relationships and personal conduct.
«Everything is the scale it needs to be within my
esthetic or conceptual
judgment.