Not exact matches
Modelers now are comparing not just hemispheric mean series, but the actual
spatial patterns of
estimated and observed climate
changes in past centuries.
Modelers of course do not compare just hemispheric mean series, but the actual
spatial patterns of
estimated and observed climate
changes in past centuries.
See e.g. this review paper (Schmidt et al, 2004), where the response of a climate model to
estimated past
changes in natural forcing due to solar irradiance variations and explosive volcanic eruptions, is shown to match the
spatial pattern of reconstructed temperature
changes during the «Little Ice Age» (which includes enhanced cooling in certain regions such as Europe).
Taking this into account will lead to large
changes in
estimates of the magnitude and
spatial distribution of aerosol forcing.
In order to
estimate globally averaged temperature
changes with a high degree of accuracy, it is necessary to have a broad
spatial distribution of observations that are made with high precision.break
NW and Ken, a short answer is that the investigators need to combine evidence of tree - line fluctuations with
estimate of past temperature
changes to model the
spatial extent of the upper treeline zone in order to avoid this problem (by ensuring that only material that was within this zone at any given time is used).
When it comes to TCR / ECS -
estimates, RF - only
estimates are pointless as the surface temperature response might well exhibit an entirely different
spatial response (with inevitable
changes in the resulting ECS, ususally expressed in terms of AF or RF - efficacy) as demonstrated in Jones et al..
Additionally, such an observing system, by measuring the temporal and
spatial variability of the AMOC for approximately a decade, would provide essential ground truth to AMOC model
estimates and would also yield insight into whether AMOC
changes or other atmospheric / oceanic variability have the dominant impact on interannual sea surface temperature (SST) variability.
However, the analysis was designed to minimize such errors, as the
spatial correlation
estimates are not sensitive to the absolute value but the
changes in the
spatial structure.
These range from simple averaging of regional data and scaling of the resulting series so that its mean and standard deviation match those of the observed record over some period of overlap (Jones et al., 1998; Crowley and Lowery, 2000), to complex climate field reconstruction, where large - scale modes of
spatial climate variability are linked to patterns of variability in the proxy network via a multivariate transfer function that explicitly provides
estimates of the spatio - temporal
changes in past temperatures, and from which large - scale average temperature
changes are derived by averaging the climate
estimates across the required region (Mann et al., 1998; Rutherford et al., 2003, 2005).