The combined model created as a result of the research also provides more accurate
estimates on the climate impacts of human activity - caused particulates.
Not exact matches
Among the factors that could cause actual results to differ materially are the following: (1) worldwide economic, political, and capital markets conditions and other factors beyond the Company's control, including natural and other disasters or
climate change affecting the operations of the Company or its customers and suppliers; (2) the Company's credit ratings and its cost of capital; (3) competitive conditions and customer preferences; (4) foreign currency exchange rates and fluctuations in those rates; (5) the timing and market acceptance of new product offerings; (6) the availability and cost of purchased components, compounds, raw materials and energy (including oil and natural gas and their derivatives) due to shortages, increased demand or supply interruptions (including those caused by natural and other disasters and other events); (7) the
impact of acquisitions, strategic alliances, divestitures, and other unusual events resulting from portfolio management actions and other evolving business strategies, and possible organizational restructuring; (8) generating fewer productivity improvements than
estimated; (9) unanticipated problems or delays with the phased implementation of a global enterprise resource planning (ERP) system, or security breaches and other disruptions to the Company's information technology infrastructure; (10) financial market risks that may affect the Company's funding obligations under defined benefit pension and postretirement plans; and (11) legal proceedings, including significant developments that could occur in the legal and regulatory proceedings described in the Company's Annual Report
on Form 10 - K for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017, and any subsequent quarterly reports
on Form 10 - Q (the «Reports»).
Each volcano's magnitude and its
impact on climate can be
estimated from the amount of sulfate deposited in the ice.
By IFPRI's
estimate, 25 million more children will be malnourished in 2050 due to the
impact of
climate change
on global agriculture.
But while wildfires are
estimated to contribute about 18 percent of the total PM2.5 emissions in the U.S., many questions remain
on how these emissions will affect human populations, including how overall air quality will be affected, how these levels will change under
climate change, and which regions are to most likely to be
impacted.
But the two men's
estimates of soot's
impact are about twice as high as the consensus reached by the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel
on Climate Change in its 2007 report, which many scientists (including Shindell) still endorse.
The date of the
impact,
estimated at slightly less than 66 million years ago, converges with the hypothesis that worldwide
climate disruption in this period caused a mass extinction event in which 75 % of plant and animal species
on Earth suddenly became extinct, including all non-avian dinosaurs.
7It is particularly ironic that Lomborg would offer such a ridiculously precise
estimate of the cost of the
impacts of
climate change from carbon dioxide emissions, inasmuch as the entire thrust of his books chapter
on «global warming» is that practically nothing about the effects of greenhouse gases is known with certainty.
Boslough accepts the fatality
estimates for
climate change (the WHO's
estimate was made for the agency by epidemiologist Tony McMichael, of the Australian National University's National Center for Epidemiology and Population Health) as well as those for asteroid
impacts, the latter of which are based lately
on work by Harris.
The agency will use this value «until an improved
estimate of the
impacts of
climate change in the U.S. can be developed based
on the best available science and economics,» an EPA spokesperson said in an email.
Research at the University of Edinburgh first created a simple algorithm to determine the key factors shaping
climate change and then
estimated their likely
impact on the world's land and ocean temperatures.
In summary the projections of the IPCC — Met office models and all the
impact studies (especially the Stern report) which derive from them are based
on specifically structurally flawed and inherently useless models.They deserve no place in any serious discussion of future
climate trends and represent an enormous waste of time and money.As a basis for public policy their forecasts are grossly in error and therefore worse than useless.For further discussion and an
estimate of the coming cooling see http://climatesense-norpag.blogspot.com
This study is focused
on three specific aspects: to assess the
impact of vegetation density
on energy efficiency of a roof located at a Mediterranean coastal
climate; develop a simplified numeral model that can
estimate thermal resistance values equivalent to plants and substrates, and finally, to verify the numerical model by using experimental data.
To quantify the
impact of human - induced
climate change
on Harvey and to
estimate whether it indeed exacerbated the rainfall thus requires taking into account the atmospheric circulation as well as the overall warming.
It's not necessarily obvious to the uninitiated what a huge effect this ~ 2ºC uncertainty in ECS
estimates has
on scenarios that attempt to predict the magnitude and timing of
climate change
impacts (e.g. the AR5 RCPs).
Based
on regional studies, the Intergovernmental Panel
on Climate Change (IPCC) estimated that 20 — 30 % of the world's species are likely to be at increasingly high risk of extinction from climate change impacts within this century if global mean temperatures exceed 2 — 3 °C above pre-industrial levels [6], while Thomas et al. [5] predicted that 15 — 37 % of species could be «committed to extinction» due to climate change b
Climate Change (IPCC)
estimated that 20 — 30 % of the world's species are likely to be at increasingly high risk of extinction from
climate change impacts within this century if global mean temperatures exceed 2 — 3 °C above pre-industrial levels [6], while Thomas et al. [5] predicted that 15 — 37 % of species could be «committed to extinction» due to climate change b
climate change
impacts within this century if global mean temperatures exceed 2 — 3 °C above pre-industrial levels [6], while Thomas et al. [5] predicted that 15 — 37 % of species could be «committed to extinction» due to
climate change b
climate change by 2050.
With more than 1000bn tonnes of carbon
estimated to be locked up in permafrost soils, the
impacts for
climate could be very significant, says Dr Sarah Chadburn, a specialist in Arctic permafrost modelling at the University of Exeter and lead author
on the new paper.
Oct. 3, 2017 - A recent study by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) scientists and collaborators is the first to use an ensemble of global chemistry
climate models to
estimate death rates from air pollution caused by the
impact of
climate change
on pollutant concentrations.
From the Physical Science Basis: «Shindell et al. (2009)
estimated the
impact of reactive species emissions
on both gaseous and aerosol forcing species and found that ozone precursors, including methane, had an additional substantial
climate effect because they increased or decreased the rate of oxidation of SO2 to sulphate aerosol.
The report of Susan Solomon's National Research Council Committee
on Stabilization Targets for Atmospheric Greenhouse Gas Concentrations is the place to go to see a collection of
impacts that have already been observed and will be amplified as the
climate changes in ways that have been quantitatively
estimated.
In other words, the results presented in «
Climate change,
impacts and vulnerability in Europe 2016» represent uncertain
estimates due to the reliance
on a limited set of data.
It's not necessarily obvious to the uninitiated what a huge effect this ~ 2ºC uncertainty in ECS
estimates has
on scenarios that attempt to predict the magnitude and timing of
climate change
impacts (e.g. the AR5 RCPs).
You could then check your ideas with real - world data and try to demonstrate that post-volcanic rings are missing, before concluding «the potential biases identified in our study necessarily
impact all existing hemispheric - scale
estimates» and «bolster the case for a significant influence of explosive volcanism
on climate in past centuries».
In essence Tung & Zhou are dining at the denialist's last - chance saloon by invoking a 60 - year natural cycle (their cycle of choice being AMO) resulting in a reduced anthropogenic influence
on climate, although they make sure to not directly challenge
climate sensitivity by asserting that their findings will
impact on assessment of net anthropogenic forcing and leave
climate sensitivity
estimates unchallenged.
and barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) in field trialsconducted in eastern Canada are explored and then used to
estimate potential
impacts of
climate change scenarios
on anticipated average yields and total production of these commodities for the Atlantic region for the 2040 to 2069 period.
It's very difficult to
estimate exactly what those
impacts will be [but] what we can say for certain is that the pressures
on agricultural production will certainly be greater because of
climate change.»
[7] Each individual
estimate of the SCC is the realization of a Monte Carlo simulation based
on a draw from an equilibrium
climate sensitivity distribution to model the
impact of CO2 emissions
on temperature.
Based
on the
estimated coefficients of mean temperatures in four regimes, we separate 78 cities into five areas with latitudes below 30 °, 31 ° -40 °, 41 ° -50 °, and 61 ° -70 °, and predict the
impacts of future
climate change
on mortality for 2021 - 2040, 2041 - 2060, and 2061 - 2100.
Pratt has provided a new tool and focuses a little (much needed IMHO) attention
on the pseudo-cyclic phenomena that
impact estimates of
climate sensitivity to a variety of things.
The Hydrologic
Impacts theme is concerned with
estimating the effects of
climate variability and change
on water resources using downscaled global
climate models and hydrologic models.
(By this I mean could one show a perceptible
impact on our planet's future
climate at a reasonable cost per degree C global warming averted a) at an
estimated 2xCO2
climate sensitivity of 3C or b) at a CS of 1C?)
Studies surveyed Millar, R. et al. (2017) Emission budgets and pathways consistent with limiting warming to 1.5 C, Nature Geophysics, doi: 10.1038 / ngeo3031 Matthews, H.D., et al. (2017)
Estimating Carbon Budgets for Ambitious
Climate Targets, Current Climate Change Reports, doi: 10.1007 / s40641 -017-0055-0 Goodwin, P., et al. (2018) Pathways to 1.5 C and 2C warming based on observational and geological constraints, Nature Geophysics, doi: 10.1038 / s41561 -017-0054-8 Schurer, A.P., et al. (2018) Interpretations of the Paris climate target, Nature Geophysics, doi: 10.1038 / s41561 -018-0086-8 Tokarska, K., and Gillett, N. (2018) Cumulative carbon emissions budgets consistent with 1.5 C global warming, Nature Climate Change, doi: 10.1038 / s41558 -018-0118-9 Millar, R., and Friedlingstein, P. (2018) The utility of the historical record for assessing the transient climate response to cumulative emissions, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, doi: 10.1098 / rsta.2016.0449 Lowe, J.A., and Bernie, D. (2018) The impact of Earth system feedbacks on carbon budgets and climate response, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, doi: 10.1098 / rsta.2017.0263 Rogelj, J., et al. (2018) Scenarios towards limiting global mean temperature increase below 1.5 C, Nature Climate Change, doi: 10.1038 / s41558 -018-0091-3 Kriegler, E., et al. (2018) Pathways limiting warming to 1.5 °C: A tale of turning around in no time, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, doi: 10.1098 / rsta.20
Climate Targets, Current
Climate Change Reports, doi: 10.1007 / s40641 -017-0055-0 Goodwin, P., et al. (2018) Pathways to 1.5 C and 2C warming based on observational and geological constraints, Nature Geophysics, doi: 10.1038 / s41561 -017-0054-8 Schurer, A.P., et al. (2018) Interpretations of the Paris climate target, Nature Geophysics, doi: 10.1038 / s41561 -018-0086-8 Tokarska, K., and Gillett, N. (2018) Cumulative carbon emissions budgets consistent with 1.5 C global warming, Nature Climate Change, doi: 10.1038 / s41558 -018-0118-9 Millar, R., and Friedlingstein, P. (2018) The utility of the historical record for assessing the transient climate response to cumulative emissions, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, doi: 10.1098 / rsta.2016.0449 Lowe, J.A., and Bernie, D. (2018) The impact of Earth system feedbacks on carbon budgets and climate response, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, doi: 10.1098 / rsta.2017.0263 Rogelj, J., et al. (2018) Scenarios towards limiting global mean temperature increase below 1.5 C, Nature Climate Change, doi: 10.1038 / s41558 -018-0091-3 Kriegler, E., et al. (2018) Pathways limiting warming to 1.5 °C: A tale of turning around in no time, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, doi: 10.1098 / rsta.20
Climate Change Reports, doi: 10.1007 / s40641 -017-0055-0 Goodwin, P., et al. (2018) Pathways to 1.5 C and 2C warming based
on observational and geological constraints, Nature Geophysics, doi: 10.1038 / s41561 -017-0054-8 Schurer, A.P., et al. (2018) Interpretations of the Paris
climate target, Nature Geophysics, doi: 10.1038 / s41561 -018-0086-8 Tokarska, K., and Gillett, N. (2018) Cumulative carbon emissions budgets consistent with 1.5 C global warming, Nature Climate Change, doi: 10.1038 / s41558 -018-0118-9 Millar, R., and Friedlingstein, P. (2018) The utility of the historical record for assessing the transient climate response to cumulative emissions, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, doi: 10.1098 / rsta.2016.0449 Lowe, J.A., and Bernie, D. (2018) The impact of Earth system feedbacks on carbon budgets and climate response, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, doi: 10.1098 / rsta.2017.0263 Rogelj, J., et al. (2018) Scenarios towards limiting global mean temperature increase below 1.5 C, Nature Climate Change, doi: 10.1038 / s41558 -018-0091-3 Kriegler, E., et al. (2018) Pathways limiting warming to 1.5 °C: A tale of turning around in no time, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, doi: 10.1098 / rsta.20
climate target, Nature Geophysics, doi: 10.1038 / s41561 -018-0086-8 Tokarska, K., and Gillett, N. (2018) Cumulative carbon emissions budgets consistent with 1.5 C global warming, Nature
Climate Change, doi: 10.1038 / s41558 -018-0118-9 Millar, R., and Friedlingstein, P. (2018) The utility of the historical record for assessing the transient climate response to cumulative emissions, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, doi: 10.1098 / rsta.2016.0449 Lowe, J.A., and Bernie, D. (2018) The impact of Earth system feedbacks on carbon budgets and climate response, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, doi: 10.1098 / rsta.2017.0263 Rogelj, J., et al. (2018) Scenarios towards limiting global mean temperature increase below 1.5 C, Nature Climate Change, doi: 10.1038 / s41558 -018-0091-3 Kriegler, E., et al. (2018) Pathways limiting warming to 1.5 °C: A tale of turning around in no time, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, doi: 10.1098 / rsta.20
Climate Change, doi: 10.1038 / s41558 -018-0118-9 Millar, R., and Friedlingstein, P. (2018) The utility of the historical record for assessing the transient
climate response to cumulative emissions, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, doi: 10.1098 / rsta.2016.0449 Lowe, J.A., and Bernie, D. (2018) The impact of Earth system feedbacks on carbon budgets and climate response, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, doi: 10.1098 / rsta.2017.0263 Rogelj, J., et al. (2018) Scenarios towards limiting global mean temperature increase below 1.5 C, Nature Climate Change, doi: 10.1038 / s41558 -018-0091-3 Kriegler, E., et al. (2018) Pathways limiting warming to 1.5 °C: A tale of turning around in no time, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, doi: 10.1098 / rsta.20
climate response to cumulative emissions, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, doi: 10.1098 / rsta.2016.0449 Lowe, J.A., and Bernie, D. (2018) The
impact of Earth system feedbacks
on carbon budgets and
climate response, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, doi: 10.1098 / rsta.2017.0263 Rogelj, J., et al. (2018) Scenarios towards limiting global mean temperature increase below 1.5 C, Nature Climate Change, doi: 10.1038 / s41558 -018-0091-3 Kriegler, E., et al. (2018) Pathways limiting warming to 1.5 °C: A tale of turning around in no time, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, doi: 10.1098 / rsta.20
climate response, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, doi: 10.1098 / rsta.2017.0263 Rogelj, J., et al. (2018) Scenarios towards limiting global mean temperature increase below 1.5 C, Nature
Climate Change, doi: 10.1038 / s41558 -018-0091-3 Kriegler, E., et al. (2018) Pathways limiting warming to 1.5 °C: A tale of turning around in no time, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, doi: 10.1098 / rsta.20
Climate Change, doi: 10.1038 / s41558 -018-0091-3 Kriegler, E., et al. (2018) Pathways limiting warming to 1.5 °C: A tale of turning around in no time, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, doi: 10.1098 / rsta.2016.0457
Regardless of one's views
on the accuracy of
climate models and social - cost - of - carbon
estimates, the CES will have no measurable
impact on world
climate.
«The CCR - II report correctly explains that most of the reports
on global warming and its
impacts on sea - level rise, ice melts, glacial retreats,
impact on crop production, extreme weather events, rainfall changes, etc. have not properly considered factors such as physical
impacts of human activities, natural variability in
climate, lopsided models used in the prediction of production
estimates, etc..
The first quantitative
estimate of possible CC [
climate change]
impacts on water resources in 2020 points to the fact that there would be an average and general decrease in water resources (in the order of 10 to 15 %...).
Methodological advances since the TAR have focused
on exploring the effects of different ways of downscaling from the
climate model scale to the catchment scale (e.g., Wood et al., 2004), the use of regional
climate models to create scenarios or drive hydrological models (e.g., Arnell et al., 2003; Shabalova et al., 2003; Andreasson et al., 2004; Meleshko et al., 2004; Payne et al., 2004; Kay et al., 2006b; Fowler et al., 2007; Graham et al., 2007a, b; Prudhomme and Davies, 2007), ways of applying scenarios to observed
climate data (Drogue et al., 2004), and the effect of hydrological model uncertainty
on estimated impacts of
climate change (Arnell, 2005).
A special report into aviation by the Intergovernmental Panel
on Climate Change in 1999
estimated that aeroplanes were responsible for 3.5 % of total human - caused radiative forcing, excluding the
impact of clouds.
The Intergovernmental Panel
on Climate Change
estimates an
impact of 4.0 gigatons of carbon dioxide - equivalent per year by 2030 from afforestation, given a carbon dioxide price of US$ 100 per ton (Metz, 2007).
Further, we refine the energy budget methodology for determining
climate sensitivity to minimize the
impact of natural internal variability
on the
estimate of
climate sensitivity.
So the question du jour is: Does POGA C or POGA - H minus HIST provide a better
estimate of the
impacts of ENSO / PDO
on the global
climate?
They also interviewed 28 experts familiar with the strengths and limitations of the studies, which rely
on future projections of
climate impacts to
estimate likely costs.
The section
on economics in the Summary for Policymakers starts with an added qualification: «Global economic
impacts from
climate change are difficult to
estimate.»
«More flaws in
estimates of the economic
impacts of
climate change,» Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment, February 7
climate change,» Grantham Research Institute
on Climate Change and the Environment, February 7
Climate Change and the Environment, February 7, 2018.
• Poles to tropics temperature gradient, average temp of tropics over past 540 Ma; and arguably warming may be net - beneficial overall • Quotes from IPCC AR4 WG1 showing that warming would be beneficial for life, not damaging • Quotes from IPCC AR5 WG3 stating (in effect) that the damage functions used for
estimating damages are not supported by evidence • Richard Tol's breakdown of economic
impacts of GW by sector • Economic damages of
climate change — about the IAMs • McKitrick — Social Cost of Carbon much lower than commonly stated • Bias
on impacts of GHG emissions — Figure 1 is a chart showing 15 recent
estimates of SCC — Lewis and Curry, 2015, has the lowest uncertainty range.
«
Climate sensitivity estimates are greatly impacted by such variability especially when the observed record is used to try to place limits on equilibrium climate sensitivity [Otto et al., 2013], and simply using the ORAS - 4 estimates of OHC changes in the 2000s instead of those used by Otto... changes their computed equilibrium climate sensitivity from 2.0 °C to 2.5 °C, for in
Climate sensitivity
estimates are greatly
impacted by such variability especially when the observed record is used to try to place limits
on equilibrium
climate sensitivity [Otto et al., 2013], and simply using the ORAS - 4 estimates of OHC changes in the 2000s instead of those used by Otto... changes their computed equilibrium climate sensitivity from 2.0 °C to 2.5 °C, for in
climate sensitivity [Otto et al., 2013], and simply using the ORAS - 4
estimates of OHC changes in the 2000s instead of those used by Otto... changes their computed equilibrium
climate sensitivity from 2.0 °C to 2.5 °C, for in
climate sensitivity from 2.0 °C to 2.5 °C, for instance.
The
estimates — based
on analysis of fire's
impact on emissions of carbon dioxide, nitrous oxide, and methane; albedo or the reflectivity of Earth's surface; and release of aerosols and other particulates — suggest fire plays a major large role in
climate than conventionally believed.
Summary of
estimated impacts of observed
climate changes
on yields over 1960 - 2013 for four major crops in temperate and tropical regions.
Marco Springmann, post-doctoral researcher in population health at the Oxford Martin Programme
on the Future of Food at Oxford University, UK, and colleagues report in The Lancet that their study of the
impact of
climate change
on diet and bodyweight is the first of its kind, and the first to
estimate the possible number of deaths in 155 countries.
«Although the
climate change
impacts of palm oil production
on tropical peatland are becoming more widely recognized, this research shows that
estimates of emissions have been drawn from a very limited number of scientific studies, most of which have underestimated the actual scale of emissions from oil palm,» said study co-author Ross Morrison of the University of Leicester.
3) They include
estimates of model - based
climate metrics»
impacts on things such as ``... crime,... energy, human mortality, and labor...» in their economic modeling games.