Not exact matches
Thus she established a proprietary
estoppel; and
because this was based on an agreement it gave rise to a constructive trust by which H «holds his equitable charge on the property on trust for [W]» (para 59).
Additionally, the SJC rejected Otis» arguments that judicial
estoppel should not be applied
because: (1) Otis is bringing the present suit as an assignee of Cusick and is therefore presenting Cusick's claims, not his own; (2) Otis himself did not make inconsistent statement under oath concerning his comparative negligence; and (3) the SJC previously rejected use of judicial
estoppel in cases of assignment of legal malpractice claims.
Beyond that, equitable
estoppel was at play,
because a court clerk had led counsel to believe that the fees order would be revised to show payment would come from the superior court.
This was
because of something called «collateral
estoppel.»
The court did not have to get to the
estoppel argument
because the «not in writing» argument failed so completely.
Mr James» first claim for proprietary
estoppel was unsuccessful, and so he sought to argue that his father's will was invalid
because he had lacked capacity to make it in the first place.
The arbitrator granted summary disposition in favor of the defendants, finding that: (1) CHSI was not a proper respondent to the action and that Weirton failed to state claims against CHSI; (2) all of Weirton's claims, except for the breach - of - contract claim against Quorum, were barred by res judicata or collateral
estoppel; (3) Weirton's breach - of - contract claim against Quorum was time - barred under the applicable Tennessee statute of limitations; (4) Weirton's tort claims were alternatively barred by the gist - of - the - action doctrine; and (5) Weirton's unjust enrichment claim was barred
because of the parties» contracts (the «Second Award»).
Civil claims will continue, he adds, but «
because the criminal conviction is wiped out, the plaintiffs can not rely on it as proof in their case, if my dim memory of collateral
estoppel serves me right.»
Mentioning issue
estoppel would have caused my page views to crash through the floor, which would have been a pity
because there is a recent case that raises an interesting technical point about issue
estoppel and standard of review.
This is so
because (1) such findings do not constitute facts «not subject to reasonable dispute» within the meaning of Rule 201; 13 and (2) «were [it] permissible for a court to take judicial notice of a fact merely
because it had been found to be true in some other action, the doctrine of collateral
estoppel would be superfluous.»
The tenant was seeking to establish an
estoppel and although there was failure to satisfy the strict requirements set out in Willmott,
because both parties were unaware of the need to register the option, the judge took the view that proprietary
estoppel required a broader approach.
Because she had been a member of the association and licensed to use the marks for 20 years, she was barred by a legal doctrine known as licensee
estoppel.